Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
REALITY CHECK
DANIEL GREENFIELD
FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE
FR POSTED

EDITED EXCERPT---The Clintons had extensive ties with figures in the energy industry; companies that dug into Libya’s energy sector, Royal Dutch Shell and BP, were Clinton Foundation donors. But Hillary Clinton hid emails discussing the exploitation of Libya’s oil fields. The Clintons had made an art out of merging their political and financial agendas

Some of the deleted emails discussed this with Clinton Foundation employee Sidney Blumenthal (Clinton pumped Sid's sham hiring as "working on promoting Bill's presidential legacy"); Blumenthal was also providing Hillary with what was facetiously labeled "intel" that actually came from business interests.

Blumenthal was looking to profit while promising that the Libyan War would be an easy matter. Blumenthal encouraged “shock and awe” bombing in Libya.

According to Congressman Gowdy, “Blumenthal pushed hard for a no-fly zone in Libya before the idea was being discussed internally by senior U.S. government officials.”

Blumenthal blasted Obama for being “unenthusiastic about regime change in Libya.” Blumenthal called for providing the Jihadists with “armor piercing weapons” and called Secretary of Defense Gates a “mean, vicious little prick” who is “losing” the debate.

Blumenthal also offered a very specific “national interest” argument that Obama would later echo, suggesting that Obama was unknowingly parroting the talking points of Blumenthal.....a man he loathed....talking points which had been handed to Obama by Hillary Clinton.

Loyal Democrat Blumenthal also told Hillary Clinton that the war had to be ramped up....or Obama would lose the election.

===========================================

NOTE WELL At no time did the safety and security of Americans factor into the Hillary/Blumenthal communiques.

16 posted on 10/23/2015 7:58:30 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Liz; SeekAndFind; LucyT

I believe they already have her on one count of perjury

Being home alone is of no significance to anything. BUt lying about it is perjury

When the questioner asked if she was alone, the answer was already know. It was the last question, the target question to a series of queries.
Her response not a simple: alone, staff in house, always present SS on duty BUT a guilt induced cackle. That “evil laugh” is usually an uncontrollable reflex of a guilty party being confronted with reality
It was admitting psychologically to a “secret act” that she knows is wrong
As I said questioner knew the answer before it was asked. They know who was with her. Camera? Testimony? Log book?


27 posted on 10/23/2015 8:24:02 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson