From the article:
“...nothing in the facts suggested intentional misconduct.”
So, does that imply that plain old dumbass misconduct is OK? If so, then we are in a great deal of trouble. Seems like it would give great incentive for governments to find the dumbest people that they can find to hire, because then it gives them a certain level of immunity.
“So, does that imply that plain old dumbass misconduct is OK? If so, then we are in a great deal of trouble. Seems like it would give great incentive for governments to find the dumbest people that they can find to hire, because then it gives them a certain level of immunity.”
Rather Hillaryish, no?