The Daily Mail picks up on a point that I made yesterday. They found a bunch of Syrian women upset that their husbands have left. Yesterday I asked the question. We know that 73% of the refugees are male - and they are able-bodied, military-aged men. Those that are refugees, 73%. I said, "Where are their wives and kids?
"Why aren't they staying home and waging war and trying to defend and protect their families? Why are they fleeing? Are they cowards? Why are they leaving?"
This is a question nobody in the Drive-Bys is asking, and the reason not asking is because the assumption is they're poor and they're war torn and they're starving and they're bedraggled and they're simply seeking safety and solace. In other words, they're clean and pure as the wind-driven snow. They are excellent. They are great people.
They are exactly the people liberals claim everybody ought to be: Totally dependent, incapable of taking care of themselves, victims of something or other somewhere. That is why the left wants to embrace them all, because they are just living definitions of how to increase power. But the question is: "Wait a minute. Why are all these young, able-bodied military men fleeing their own homes rather than staying and defending them, rather than staying and trying to beat back the bad guys?
"Why are they running away and leaving their wives and their families and their children?" The Daily Mail finally tracks that down today, and actually found some women willing to speak, upset that their husbands are leaving them. The left will not even consider the fact that it is a refugee army. They won't even consider the possibility it's a massive plan to infiltrate countries all over Europe with able-bodied, military-capable jihadists such as those who acted Friday night in Paris.
You're not even allowed to mention that possibility. If you do, why, you're engaging inhumane conduct and language and you are insulting and so forth. But it's something that needs to be considered. But above and beyond that, okay, these 73% that are refugees, they're staying. They're getting somewhere. Many of them are staying. They're staying Germany. They're going to Belgium. Wherever they're accepted, they go - and after a while, they are the equivalent of residents.
Nobody seems to be focusing enough energy or investigation into finding out who they really are and why they are doing what they're doing, and are they lying in wait for some signal or what have you. Andy McCarthy just published a... He's got an ongoing series of the jihadist fifth column, and this is what he's talking about: Islamic jihadists disguised as ordinary citizens and refugees who are already relocated, already in residence in these very places, in various places, including in the United States. ..."
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/11/19/the_jihadists_among_us
“They found some women...”
In the ME women when a female child in born into a family relatives start thinking in terms of a ‘wife’ for one of their sons. First cousin ‘marriage’ is common. If a man dies or is killed in war his brothers have ‘responsibility’ for his wife or wives....
Rather than reporters attempting to find some women who “were left” - they need to interview some of the men in Europe - and FIND OUT how many have wives and children. As far as ‘poverty’ is concerned? Many of these men are paying thousands of dollars for passage. The stories seem about as honest as the pictures taken by meme driven photographers who focus on getting pictures of women and children at the center of every picture of ‘refugees’...
All I’m saying is that we’re probably NOT getting the truth on what’s happening - - forces that benefit from cheap labor and political sob stories are controlling. I’m not there so I don’t know for sure... but I know the questions I would be asking...