Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JoSixChip

Fair enough, but if Perot had not run in 92, Clinton would not have won.


79 posted on 11/23/2015 8:38:03 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

True but he would have won in 96 or some other scumbag from the rat party.

Perot is not comparable to Trump. Trump will not split the vote, he will take the vote.


93 posted on 11/23/2015 8:46:28 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
Fair enough, but if Perot had not run in 92, Clinton would not have won.

The bush's destroyed the conservative brand. The only reason w^3 was elected is because clintion was a scumbag. This country was designed to be run by citizen leaders, not politicians.
117 posted on 11/23/2015 9:05:17 PM PST by JoSixChip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson