To: Red Badger
Why are we allowed to describe them as juveniles but not allowed to give other descriptions??
To: Dilbert San Diego
It’s WaPo.....................It’s what they do..................
10 posted on
11/25/2015 10:36:02 AM PST by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Silly you...”teens” was used in the earlier altercation in Georgetown. See, we now have TWO descriptive words.
21 posted on
11/25/2015 10:41:36 AM PST by
ProtectOurFreedom
(For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
To: Dilbert San Diego
It’s age discrimination. They need to stick to neutral language like “unspecified lifeforms.”
72 posted on
11/25/2015 11:29:00 AM PST by
JediJones
(The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Why are we allowed to describe them as juveniles but not allowed to give other descriptions??Everyone already knows what they look like.
107 posted on
11/25/2015 12:20:35 PM PST by
Drew68
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson