Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: strings6459

“It is pre-revolution and reflects the policy of our English masters.”

That is very incorrect. The concept of having police forces was an uncommon concept in those periods of history. The legal principle of hue and cry was common to most Western societies, and not just the English/British. This was particularly true of the American colonists regardless of whether they were English, French, Spanish, Dutch, or Swede. The colonists were expected to defend themselves against raids by other Europeans and by the Amerindian tribes. So much so, there were laws regarding the requirement to come to church with their arms mandated by law. These laws continued after the Revolutionary War had ended.


6 posted on 12/02/2015 8:31:58 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

I did not know about this until now buit have often advocated for such laws today. In fact, in support of women’s rights, I would include them in the requirement to be armed. Further, were I king, one would be required to be armed in order to travel including on public transportation.


8 posted on 12/02/2015 10:12:08 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson