Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/07/2015 10:43:23 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Reforming our dysfunctional health care system requires more than high deductibles and HSAs.

...

Right. We have to do something about the politicians who prefer dysfunction because that leads to bigger government, more money and more power for them.


2 posted on 12/07/2015 10:46:23 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Central planning, cartels, and government programs are the problem.


3 posted on 12/07/2015 10:48:18 AM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Good post. No one should look at Canada for a good example since coverage has been slowly diminishing by constantly removing covered procedures and medications. Health care here has become rationed big time. Surgical waits are unbelievable and dangerous. I’m so thankful we were smart enough to continue employment extended health care on our own, sort of costly, but more valuable every year.


4 posted on 12/07/2015 10:52:52 AM PST by Mare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Tis The Season
To End The FReepathon


Click The Pic To Donate


5 posted on 12/07/2015 11:04:38 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Go back to free market. Let charity work w/the poor. Used to have charitable hospitals before the depression.


6 posted on 12/07/2015 11:05:30 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Affordable Healthcare Act is typical of all liberal policies. It does the opposite of what it claims to do.


8 posted on 12/07/2015 11:10:59 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Government regulated health care is what drives the red portion below.


9 posted on 12/07/2015 11:16:58 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is libertye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Vastly increase the bureacracy required to run it. Vastly increase the amount of paperwork, digital or dead-tree, Add in no modifications for pre-existing conditions, and you are going to lower costs? The only way tolower costs and keep the new structure is to eliminate medicine, remove all health delivery from the system but continue to legally require everyone to buy coverage. Even with that the overhead will inevitably rise to far outstrip income.


10 posted on 12/07/2015 11:19:05 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
A dozen years ago health reformers promoted Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) coupled with high-deductible plans. A fair criticism of HSAs is that hospitalized patients have long since exceeded their deductibles. Moreover, critically-ill patients are unlikely to forgo a potentially beneficial medical service merely because they bear a portion of the marginal cost. Much more needs to be done.

What crap. What the author is saying in the bold section is that it is a problem when high deductible plans work as they are designed. Their purpose is to keep you from going broke when the SHTF. But according to this idiot, it's a problem that you can now afford to keep getting health care after you've paid the deductible. He'd prefer that the seriously ill consider not getting so much care.

And then he talks about policymakers designing the plans. If it was an Aetna policy designer/actuary, then ok. But I'm sure he's talking about a government policymaker, who was the person who got us into this mess in the first place.

11 posted on 12/07/2015 11:38:48 AM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Our health care system could be dramatically improved, but it must involve more efficient care for our sickest patients. Consider this: about 5 percent of patients spend nearly half of all health care dollars, while the sickest 1 percent consume nearly one-quarter of health care expenditures. These figures suggest there are more opportunities to reduce health care spending by carefully managing the sickest 5 percent instead of wasting our efforts on the 80 percent who are relatively healthy. Thus, health reform requires improving incentives that positively affect the sickest patients.

It's shocking an adult could be this naive.

This person thinks medical centers don't try to keep costs low? What's the thought process behind that?

Every patient is on DRGs (diagnostic related groups) or Medicare. The services they charge for are capped!!!!!

If you go in for DRG 324, you get what the insurance company or Medicare pays for DRG 324. PERIOD!

What does the hospital try to do? It tries it's very best to cover that DRG 324 for the lowest possible outlay.

The idea the care for these patients is lush and over the top reveals the writer to have no clue whatsoever about modern health care.

12 posted on 12/07/2015 11:52:16 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Come on Obama, just fess up and put the Burka on. Be honest with everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mears

bfl


21 posted on 12/07/2015 12:44:23 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Two words. Price transparency. Without it no reform is possible, with it the problems solve themselves in short order.

How to achieve it? Simple: All medical insurance payments may only be made directly to the beneficiary who is covered by the policy. No direct payments to any intermediary. They must present an actual itemized bill for every fee and service and be paid by the patient.

But of course nobody wants to really solve the root issue, which is why all talk of "reform" is just window dressing.

25 posted on 12/07/2015 1:05:38 PM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Just had a physical checkup.

Dr was speaking well of what some companies are doing, creating a direct annual-fee contractual relationship with a doctors group, no insurance middle man. Big expenses are covered by a catastrophic plan.


29 posted on 12/07/2015 1:51:45 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson