Posted on 12/09/2015 6:56:37 PM PST by Kaslin
Source: CFACT's own Marc Morano, hero of the Climate Hustle documentary film.
The Senate will not approve or appropriate money for anything President Obama might agree to in Paris, and developing countries will not (and should not) stop building coal-fired power plants and using fossil fuels to lift billions out of abject poverty. However, we cannot let down our guard.
Mr. Obama will do everything possible to go around Congress and impose more Executive Branch anti-hydrocarbon edicts, to get a hypothetical, undetectable 0.05 degree reduction in average global temperatures 85 years from now. Meanwhile, the $1.5-trillion-per-year Climate Crisis Industry is determined to protect its money train, redistribute the world's wealth, and increase its power over our lives, livelihoods and living standards. That means the mischief afoot in Paris will never stay in Paris.
The vast majority of the 40,000 attending the climate gabfest are alarmists, who have their time and lavish expenses paid by taxpayers or corporate cronies. But they still want to silence the few "dangerous manmade global warming" skeptics who have been able to attend the event on their own nickel. They want to revoke our conference credentials … and prosecute us as "racketeers" and "climate criminals" when the real criminals are the alarmists, who are committing crimes against humanity and our planet.
They use climate chaos claims to justify spending countless billions annually for biased, pseudo-scientific research. They then use that "research" to justify programs that convert habitats and croplands into palm oil and ethanol plantations, wind farms and solar facilities; slaughter birds and bats by the millions; raise food and food aid costs; and leave more people starving longer.
Alarmist policies cause numerous deaths every year from lung, intestinal and other diseases due to an absence of electricity, refrigeration and safe drinking water, and Western governments and banks refusing to provide financial support for power plants. It's not fossil fuels that kill. It's the absence of fossil fuels.
Unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats and their radical environmentalist allies in the EPA, UN and EU want to de-carbonize, de-industrialize and de-develop rich countries and tell poor countries what level of development and "sustainable" living standards their families will be permitted to enjoy.
Meanwhile, Malaysian representative Gurdial Singh Nijar told the 40,000 attendees: "You [developed countries] grew to this level of prosperity because you burned fossil fuel at an unabated rate. You created the [climate] problem." India Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar has bluntly said "the bill for climate action for the world is not just $100 billion. It is in trillions of dollars per year." To be paid by countries that climate policies will make less developed, less rich and less employed every year!
First, the bill for WHAT problem, exactly? White House press releases, COP21 climate conference speeches and climate computer models are not evidence – especially when real-world events completely contradict the Climate Hustle and Hype. Global temperatures haven’t risen in 19 years. Greenland and Antarctic ice caps are growing, not shrinking. Sea levels are rising at barely seven inches per century. Oceans are firmly alkaline, not acidic. Hurricane and tornado activity is below historic averages.
So before alarmists say another word about responsibility, prevention, reparation and compensation, they need to prove that real-world climate disasters and extreme weather events from the past few decades are due to humans and fossil fuel emissions instead of natural forces and fluctuations. They need to prove that those events are unprecedented beyond what humanity has had to deal with in the past.
Most of all, they need to do it in a full-throated debate, where they have to defend their claims, data and studies in the open – and be questioned, challenged and cross-examined by experts from our side.
Second, fossil fuels power technologies that have lifted billions out of poverty, disease and despair … and that poor developing nations are now using to do the same. Developed countries burn fossil fuels to create and manufacture those technologies. Do poor countries want them or not? They can't have it both ways.
Third, what Mr. Obama and climate alarmists at the 21st Conference of Parties (COP21) in Paris are trying to impose on the world should chill rational people to the bone.
The president has unilaterally "pledged" that the United States will slash its carbon dioxide emissions by 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2025 even after America reduced those emissions significantly since 1990. The impact on poor, working class and minority families will be disastrous, but he and his bureaucracy and Big Green allies don't seem to give a spotted owl hoot.
But now, on top of that, they and the alarmists gathered in Paris have prepared a draft climate treaty that really will "fundamentally transform" the United States and industrialized world, just as President Obama promised he would do. You can find the full text of the draft COP21 agreement here, in obtuse UN-speak and the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow's plain-language analysis here. The Heartland Institute provides extensive additional realism here, addressing climate change and the Paris process.
Most developed countries want binding commitments by all nations: that they will reach specified CO2 reduction targets by specific dates. The huge coalition of "Like-Minded Developing Countries," led by China and India, want nonbinding commitments, or no commitments. They will agree only to do their best to cap their emissions by around 2030, and then gradually reduce them as their economies improve and their power plants, factories and cars become more efficient, less polluting, less CO2-emitting.
This is called "differentiated responsibilities." It means CO2 reduction commitments will apply only to already developed nations, which may also be subject to a new International Tribunal of Climate Justice. Currently rich countries will also have to provide additional "justice" in the form of cash: $100 billion a year to begin with, then 1% of GDP (which would be some $167 billion per year for the USA alone), plus billions more in free technology to cover climate adaptation costs, reparations for past climate damages, and "losses and damages" from extreme weather events caused (solely) by now-rich countries.
The theory, the claim, the delusion " the money-grubbing, power-grabbing pretense " behind all of this is that controlling FRC (Formerly Rich Country) CO2 emissions will somehow hold the projected global temperature increase to 1.5 or 2.0 degrees Celsius (2.7 or 3.6 deg F). In other words, alarmists want us to believe that carbon dioxide functions as Earth's thermostat, even though it represents barely 0.040% of the atmosphere (argon is 0.93% and oxygen is 20%).
Just as absurd, this is supposed to happen even if poor countries continue building coal-fired power plants, driving more cars, emitting more greenhouse gases, and increasing atmospheric CO2 to perhaps 0.05% (500 ppm), from its pre-industrial level of around 0.028% (280 ppm).
All this may happen in Fantasy Land computer models. It doesn't and won't happen in the Real World.
Climate Chaos Theory also absurdly assumes that any global average temperature increase above 2 deg C will somehow be cataclysmic – even though a warmer planet with more CO2 in the air will greatly improve forest, grassland, algae and crop growth. And all this nonsense is driving the Paris insanity.
Nevertheless, President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are determined to lock the United States into this Iran-2 deal legally, "morally" or because they signed it. It's all part of their latest apology tour: America's mea culpa for having used fossil fuels to improve lives all over the world.
Perhaps craziest of all, these computer-world, Sim Planet climate disasters are supposed to be far worse than the all-too-real butchery we have witnessed in San Bernardino, Boston, Fort Hood, Israel, Bali, Mali, Madrid, Mumbai, London, Lebanon, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Kenya, Nigeria and Paris! With more to come.
When will the outrages and insanities cease?
A good summary.
But will Obola’s NY Times read it?
Would Obola’s NY Time print it?
Of course, shakedown scheme all the way around, from algore, Hillary Clinton to the third world.
Obama will get his money even if he has to shut down the Military and take theirs
Meanwhile, Malaysian representative Gurdial Singh Nijar told the 40,000 attendees: “You [developed countries] grew to this level of prosperity because you burned fossil fuel at an unabated rate. You created the [climate] problem.” India Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar has bluntly said “the bill for climate action for the world is not just $100 billion. It is in trillions of dollars per year.” To be paid by countries that climate policies will make less developed, less rich and less employed every year!
why do they need the money when obama said if Africa develops like the West it will damage the planet
True story there. This is nothing but a cash cow for the rubes among us.
You can give these countries 50 Trillion dollars they’ll still want to live in caves .How much money have we wasted on Africa and they’re still barefoot and in rags ,well except their Leaders ,the ones that take all the money
I seem to recall that you are a medical doctor, or that you once worked full time as a health professional. Is that correct?
Most people don't realize that 18% of their body weight is carbon.
Are there any medications or foods or fluids that harmlessly remove free carbon from the body or harmlessly bust up certain kinds of carbon molecules?
Since Obama claims that CO2 is a “pollutant,” I was thinking how funny a headline like this would be:
“Doctor Makes Shock Claim - 18% Of Your Body Is Carbon!”
Then, we follow up with “De-Carbonize With Dr. Kaslin!”
Then we direct customers to “Dr. Kaslin’s Little Pills” or Dr. Kaslin’s Carbon Cleanse Health Spa,” etc., etc.
This idea is making me laugh out loud, so I had to share it with you.
And carbon is healthy for plants. More plants convert more more ‘greenhouse’ gas into oxygen. Heat increases evaporation of sea water which leads to more clouds which blocks sunlight and helps cool the earth while watering those beautiful plants.
Heat also increases seizmic pressure which causes more cracks in the earth’s crust — volcanoes. More volcanoes spew volanic ash which blocks sunlight. Volcanic ash also helps plants thrive. More plants, less C02.
Enough plants in one area, and you have more cloud cover and more rain. Blocks sunlight, nourishes even more plants. And trees too.
Stability. Stabilizing influences on our planet’s temperature.
If they’re really scared of CO2, they should cut down most of the forests and grow more grass because grass is more efficient at reducing C02.
Later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.