Posted on 12/12/2015 7:01:02 AM PST by rktman
Sometime round about now the negotiators at the Paris COP21 climate conference will be thrashing out the final details agreement which will make no measurable difference to “climate change†but will definitely cost all of us a great deal of money.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
1. Define the "correct" temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the "correct" humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the "correct" mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the "correct" amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the "correct" makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the "correct" amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Crickets.................
Ping
“Again, the simple list of questions/definitions left unanswered: “
The only question being asked is how much money is in it for me?
Sending America Backward ... to 1830? [Zero and Paris Warmer talks]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3371714/posts
“Average per capita GDP in 2050 would be less than what Americans had in 1830! Many futuristic technologies would still exist, but only wealthy families and ruling elites could afford them.â€
~~~~~
And we’re talking about PARIS. Those creeps. Did they have to step over bodies during their talks? Did they have to wipe blood off their heels?
Rather than scuttle our economy, they should ponder the condition of US mosques. [Info coming up.]
Study Shows U.S. Mosques Are Repositories of Muslim Brotherhood Literature and Preachers
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3371633/posts
Of the 100 mosques surveyed,
51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence;
30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence;
19% had no violent texts at all.
LOL! Oh, you ain’t gettin’ any of it. Me neither. Actually, I’ll probably have to pay some sort of denier fine/penalty.
God beat them to it.
Man is incapable of impacting any of it.
Here is the updated climate report:
The hot air is blowing from Washington DC and the European Capitals toward the homelands of the liberal victim groups with greatly increased mass and velocity.
The outlook for expanded wealth redistribution from the relatively few remaining employed Americans actually paying taxes to third world Obama-Toilets has increased exponentially.
Well connected “Green” government contractors expect to reap record profits from the whirlwind of changes.
When they die, most of these people WILL experience the type of climate change they tell us we should fear.
“Today’s forecast, mostly fire and brimstone and - trust us - you don’t want to know what today’s high will be! Continuing on into the next millennium doesn’t look good either. And that AC guy... well, he says he won’t be able to make it after all. Something about a hugh gulf that fixed between you and him. He did recommend NOT screaming and hollering so much. He said it probably contributes to part of the, shall we say, climate change you’re experiencing.”
That's exactly all this is.
One of the things to keep in mind about living in an affluent society is that you eventually reach the point where you don't really need to buy much at all. Even people below the poverty line in the U.S. live like kings compared to most of the world.
The "problem" with this is that it inevitably results in economic stagnation -- because our capacity to produce things far exceeds our ability to consume them. For example, how many cars can automakers sell in this country when we already have more registered vehicles (about 250 million) than licensed drivers (210 million)?
Major industries, in this scenario, ultimately reach the point where their only real growth potential lies in government incentives -- and even mandates -- for people and businesses to buy a lot of crap that they don't really need. "Cash for Clunkers" was all about stimulating demand for the Big Three automakers. Low-energy light bulb regulations are nothing more than a "stimulus program" for GE. Low-emission diesel engine mandates were only imposed to stimulate demand for new engines built by Cummins and Detroit Diesel.
And "global warming" is nothing more than a scam whose sole purpose is to generate demand for new energy infrastructure to replace existing infrastructure that is perfectly useful.
One set of terms that bothers me that is used constantly but never remarked upon is “Developed vs Developing”. Developed implies finality as if there is no further progress possible, we are at the apex. Just like what was considered unimaginable wealth and luxury 100 years ago is considered poverty today, I can for see developing countries obtaining our current level of “wealth and luxury”, but that will only happen if the powers that be do not totally crush innovation. If we progress, and others get to our current level (based on technological innovations that our culture creates) that country will still be poor (relative to us), and will still need nonstop charity. But at any rate, I do not like the term developed as if we are as far as we can go
Our dear leader has just stolen 1 billion more dollars from hard working Americans and is going to give it to other countries (Not to mention he has enacted climate regulations that are costing us billions more for a problem that doesn't exist)
“Today’s forecast, mostly fire and brimstone and it’s gonna be hella hot folks- We must act now to avert further climate change- Everyone is going to have to work overtime until we get this heat under control. Have a nice day muahahahaha”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.