What's the all the fuss? It's just the final stages of the implementation of Obamanomics. We knew this was the plan didn't we? We didn't really believe we could spend ourselves into prosperity, did we?
To: Perseverando
This guy strings together big words poorly, and is a bit of a drama queen.
Next!
2 posted on
12/21/2015 9:40:46 AM PST by
ConservativeWarrior
(Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
To: Perseverando
I gave up after this:
“...in a society literally dying from the diminishing returns and unintended consequences of technology. “
If he thinks that “technology” is the root of societies ills, then he is most likely wrong on a myriad other things.
Sorry - no thanks...
3 posted on
12/21/2015 9:43:27 AM PST by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: Perseverando
Good grief, what a windbag! A Yuletide tirade by a pseudo intellectual midget with a large vocabulary to express his dumbshittery. And of course, in typical liberal fashion, he resorts to spouting nonstop insults to the thing that liberals hate and think they’re so superior to, but in reality delude themselves by deriding the blue collar billionaire.
This one is constipated with vile and piss. I’ll pass.
8 posted on
12/21/2015 10:22:06 AM PST by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: Perseverando
I wouldn’t trust the Zero Hedge web site because their unrelenting negativity has made them cry “wolf” just too much.
10 posted on
12/21/2015 10:28:38 AM PST by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: Perseverando
If you want your recession you can keep your recession.
11 posted on
12/21/2015 10:30:09 AM PST by
zek157
To: Perseverando
Here I confess: for thirty years I have hated those stupid space movies, as much for their badly-written scripts (all mumbo-jumbo exposition of nonsensical story-lines between explosions)Hates them but has watched enough of them to be able to describe them.
I guess he doesn't hate them as much as he professes.
12 posted on
12/21/2015 10:32:16 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism. It is incompatible with real freedom.)
To: Perseverando
OBAMA-NOMICS,
Bringing unemployment to the masses!
OBAMA-CARE,
Bringing denial of service to the masses.
OBAMA BORDER SECURITY,
Bringing disease and DEATH to the masses.
OBAMA'S RULES OF ENGAGEMENT,
Destroying our military on all fronts.
IF you voted for this ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF, this MUSLIM TERRORIST IN CHIEF,
ANYTHING OBAMA SAYS is worthless.
Watch what he does, and not what he says.
The ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF wants ~ and is DIRECTING the policies that regulate ALL health care plansin the United States ~
TO FAIL ! NEVER FORGET THAT !
Many of us have said for many years that
Obama is doing this INTENTIONALLY. He using the old Soviet Plan from 1934 or earlier.
Only idiots and the evil voted for Obama, or ANY of the Democrats.
AND NOW, WE CAN ADD
"Establishment Republicans" TO THAT LIST, ALSO!
They've lied to us, constantly, and really are
"Collapsing the System". And now, these "Useful IDIOTS" who voted for them, are buying the lies that "Obamacare was designed to work." ?
It was designed to fail from the start.
THEN ... THEY GO TO THE
"SINGLE-PAYER SYSTEM".
They've been sucking our wallets dry for over four years now on the "Obamacare" LIE.
AND NOW THEY WANT MORE TAXES ?
Our Founding Fathers would have hung them already!
Lets review:
Who was it that cut future funding for Medicare by $575 billion?
...the president and the Democratic Party successfully bamboozle voters... The 2012 election could turn on this falsehood.
The truth is that the Obama health law reduces future funding for Medicare by $575 billion over the next 10 years ...
Mr. Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius frequently make that false claim.
Indeed, even Medicare's mailings to seniors repeat the claim
that reducing spending on Medicare will make it more financially secure for future years.
The fact is that Mr. Obama's law raids Medicare.
"In early 1968 President Lyndon Johnson [DEMOCRAT] made a change in the budget presentation by including Social Security and all other trust funds in a"unified budget." "
Who was it that expanded Medicare and Medicaid to cover many, many more people than it was originally designed to cover?
The History of Medicare
In 1965, the Social Security Act established both Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare was a responsibility of the Social Security Administration (SSA), while Federal assistance to the State Medicaid programs was administered by the Social and Rehabilitation Service (SRS). SSA and SRS were agencies in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). In 1977, the Health Care Financing Administration was created under HEW to effectively coordinate Medicare and Medicaid. In 1980 HEW was divided into the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The first U.S. President to propose a prepaid health insurance plan was Harry S. Truman [DEMOCRAT]. On November 19, 1945, in a special message to Congress, President Truman outlined a comprehensive, prepaid medical insurance plan for all people through the Social Security system. The plan included doctors and hospitals, and nursing, laboratory, and dental services; it was dubbed "National Health Insurance." Furthermore, medical insurance benefits for needy people were to be financed from Federal revenues.
Over the years, lawmakers narrowed the field of health insurance recipients largely to social security beneficiaries. A national survey found that only 56 percent of those 65 years of age or older had health insurance. President John F. Kennedy [DEMOCRAT] pressed legislators for health insurance for the aged. However, it wasn't until 1965 that President Lyndon B. Johnson signed H.R. 6675 (The Social Security Act of 1965; PL 89-97) to provide health insurance for the elderly and the poor.
On July 30, 1965, President Johnson signed the Medicare and Medicaid Bill (Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Social Security Act) in Independence, Missouri in the presence of former President Truman, who received the first Medicare card at the ceremony; Lady Bird Johnson, Vice-President Hubert Humphrey, and Mrs. Truman also were present. President Johnson remarked: "We marvel not simply at the passage of this Bill but that it took so many years to pass it."
Medicare extended health coverage to almost all Americans aged 65 or older. About 19 million beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare in the first year of the program. Medicaid provided access to health care services for certain low-income persons and expanded the existing Federal-State welfare structure that assisted the poor.
The 1972 Social Security Amendments expanded Medicare to provide coverage to two additional high risk groups disabled persons receiving cash benefits for 24 months under the social security program and persons suffering from end-stage renal disease.
...(continued at link)
So Democrats,
Sen Mark Kirk's
statement Thursday, Dec 1, 2011 ...
"There are 55 million Social Security beneficiaries that will see little or no extra cash from this 2012 tax holiday;
instead, the dedicated payroll contributions meant to pay for future benefits are being diverted from the Trust Fund
and replaced with Treasury debt that does not even have a AAA credit rating.
Social Security was designed to be independent and free from the danger of Congressional manipulation,
and maintaining the firewall between the Social Security Trust Fund and general government funding is the best way to maintain the solvency of this important program.
Neither bill protects the Social Security Trust Fund
so I voted no. "
It's not our fault that
DEMOCRATS raided the Social Security Trust Fund. Let's remember ...
Not ALL are to blame for the empty lock box.
It's the Democrats Communists.
Let's take a deeper look.
Okay, then the DEMOCRATS need to shut up!!!
14 posted on
12/21/2015 10:37:16 AM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Perseverando
Lost me when he said he hated sci-fi films.
BUT another sign of an economic crash? When will it happen? Come on already, let’s get this over with...
To: Perseverando
Theory du jour: the new Star Wars movie is sucking in whatever meager disposable lucre remains among the economically-flayed mid-to-lower orders of America During the Great Depression, movies did wonderfully well.
I've always heard that breakfast cereal consumption is inversely related to the health of the economy, so Kelloggs and Post stock is a buy during hard times.
17 posted on
12/21/2015 11:18:11 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Perseverando
Yada yada yada. Time for perennially doomcrying zerohedge to go away.
19 posted on
12/21/2015 12:06:02 PM PST by
Seruzawa
(All those memories will be lost,in time, like tears in rain.)
To: Perseverando
This guy was really grumpy when he wrote this but there is cause for alarm I think.
20 posted on
12/21/2015 1:36:19 PM PST by
Crucial
(At the heart all leftists is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
To: Perseverando
Not to worry, we are still flying half a ship! -Obi Wan.
21 posted on
12/21/2015 1:42:47 PM PST by
Idaho_Cowboy
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson