Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“Without small atomic warheads, ballistic missiles are not practical weapons.”

The Nazis were working on nuclear weapons. IIRC their initial estimate of warhead size would have been within the limits of the V-2/A4 payload (1000kg). They also had the standard arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.

And who’s to say that if the Allied bombing campaign hadn’t been successful that we wouldn’t have resorted to missiles with HE warheads?


51 posted on 01/01/2016 12:29:44 PM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: PLMerite

Because ballistic missiles with HE warheads, especially with the accuracy of the V2, are ineffective weapons. They consume more resources to build than the damage they inflict.


52 posted on 01/01/2016 12:39:59 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Islam is the greened eyed monster that doth mock the meat it feeds upon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: PLMerite

German nuclear efforts were ineffective and half-hearted at best. The Germans spent more money on the V-Waffen than the Allies did on the Manhattan Project. The Allies, the Americans specifically, spent more money on radar than they did on the Manhattan Project. It was correctly said that radar won the war, the bomb ended it.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/Bethe.html


61 posted on 01/02/2016 4:59:18 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Islam is the greened eyed monster that doth mock the meat it feeds upon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson