Posted on 01/02/2016 7:10:33 AM PST by lowbridge
I do! Back in the early 1970’s when they were pushing the ERA. Now that it is coming true, watch for the raging hypocracy when they overlook Title 9 spending, quotas, lowered standards and other measures that the left has won for women as special catagories. If a woman can become a Ranger with special help, then thousands more men can make use of those lifted restrictions as well.
and, since voyeurism isn’t generally a crime if you’re not peeking thru windows or using a recording device, there’s probably no laws on the books to prevent people from gathering in the “rooms” they are legally entitled to be in just to see what they can see.
The Romans could not see their moral rot and internal decay, though it was obvious to everyone else. The Americans of the 21st century are blind to theirs, but it will be as obvious to future generations as it would have been to past generations had they been able to witness it.
Your graphic is way too complicated for moron libs and dems to comprehend.
I”’m sure that no perverts will take advantage of this! /sarc
Kudos for seeing the perversion early on.
I did spot one about 15-20 years ago and that the growth of the man/boy clubs that wanted to lower the age of consent for boys in particular but in some cases for girls too.
It was clear that that would become part of the left’s agenda and it has in fact become so.
Dunno about Washington but generally speaking mens restrooms have been open to women for decades. I wish I had a dollar for every time a female walked in the airport/stadium/nightclub restroom while I was standing at the urinal.
All the more reason to CC.
Would be nice if the ladies remember to put the seat up after they are finished.
I based my prediction on the leftist scum media vociferously denying the goal as a goal.
No one is talking about letting men go in womens bathrooms, they would say over and over. It is just the right going crazy again. It is the wing nuts talking. Do not listen to them.
Whenever the left denies something strongly enough, you KNOW that the opposite is the case.
Every time.
Every freaking time.
I used a co-ed bathroom at the Olympics in Barcelona in the 90s. It was marginally ok because there were a lot of people of both sexes, so I felt like it was too public for pervs. If it were an empty bathroom, or one with a lone guy in it, I would have been really reluctant to use it without taking a friend. Interesting though, that what was a voluntary experiment in the 90s is now a requirement in WA in the 2010s.
Gotta warn my sister-in-law, who is going to Seattle this week.
I miss my parents, but am glad in a way that they did not live to see this.
If they identify as women, they’ll have to pee like women.
I had a friend who required any male in her home (including husband, two sons, guests, contractors, etc.)to sit when they had to urinate. I kid you not. I couldn’t believe she would instruct men that they had to sit to pee, but she did, and was quite proud of it. My son said that if she ever did that to him, not only would he stand, he’d spin around.
That was in that Jack Nicholson movie “About Schmidt”, his wife in the movie made him do the same thing and after she died he went back to standing up.
If I visit I will have my husband go in with me as my body guard.
Y’all are missing the point. Once again, a quasi-governmental AGENCY is issuing LAWS, which it has no legal right to do, thus circumventing the duties of the elected state legislatures.
These agencies— bureaucracies—are making up blatantly unconstitutional laws, then charging, arresting, decreeing fines, property seizures, and even jail terms (”rehabilitation” or “sensitivity training”) for failure to comply.
Nobody elected the “Human Rights Commission.” This is a gay group that began as a non-profit—a charity! One location in Chicago! Then another in D.C.
Now HRC has become a state agency in multiple states (in some states under different names, in order to remain “closeted” so the citizenry won’t be aware of their quasi-legal activities. In Texas, HRC is called “Texas Equality.”)
In New York, business owners can now be fined $250k for using the wrong pronoun!!
Othe examples of bureaucratic brown-shirt activities:
Bureau of Labor and Industries in Oregon—seized the Kleins’ bank account over a cake.
Bureau of Land Management—ongoing harassment of Bundy family, jailing his family—over cattle grazing rights. Also the Hammond family—to prison a second time over the same charge for which they’d already served jail time.
The Census Department, threatening fines and property liens for refusal to answer intrusive questions on a “random survey.”
We need to call our state legislators and set their ears on fire—not only in our own districts, but in the districts where these HRC assholes are operating. Make it clear we won’t tolerate these extra-judicial brown-shirts.
And...HOW did SHE know they sat? Did she also observe?
You might find this to be useful information.
Yeah, you’d think women would want access to the men’s rooms because the lines are shorter. Why IS it always one way?
They ripped a page out of the Leftist, Alinsky playbook.
They called the Ordinance the "Bathroom Bill." They ran ads depicting grown men sharing bathrooms with little girls.
Their campaign drove it to defeat.
That's how you defeat crap like this
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.