Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna
"In the typical history of these things, a miniaturized thermonuclear device is never the first test. "

Unless there was a technology transfer.

I stand corrected on the historical size of fission devices. They would have to be huge for that yield.

48 posted on 01/05/2016 11:00:56 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

“I stand corrected on the historical size of fission devices. They would have to be huge for that yield.”

Not really.


53 posted on 01/05/2016 11:19:34 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
Unless there was a technology transfer.

I don't believe the Russians would transfer thermonuclear technology to the North Koreans. Nuclear, yes. Big Stuff, no.

And the Chinese would certainly not do it, they got the destabilization of US interests they wanted with the initial nuclear transfers. Remember, far more damaging to us than even "H-bombs" is deliverability. If the Russians or Chinese were really serious about arming NoKorea the Norks would not be working on improving Scuds; they would already have gotten ballistic missile tech.

56 posted on 01/05/2016 11:45:49 PM PST by FredZarguna (Deathblow: "Not because of who you are, but because of different reasons altogether.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson