Posted on 01/06/2016 8:31:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind
How true! Chrissy usually badgers and grabs an ankle like a pit bull, and will ask the same question over and over again until he gets an answer. Here he gives the Hilldabeast an easy out right at the top.
"unfortunately we still have a large(mostly older)segment of the population that hasn't been hollywood/academia brain-fornicated, and as such, we have to continue to Gruber the masses until such time as those UN-indoctrinated folks, those who hold on to their irrelevant religion and Constitution, die off...some of us revolutionaries have become a little impatient, that's all...but the plan, and it's execution, are still on track to bring America into the progressive Soros/Buffett/Gates-global utopian fold"
...where they(remaining brainwashed sheeple)can be fed/pampered by the puppet-masters, herded like free-range cattle...then slaughtered.
..."Hail Satan!"
Well...
Socialist is someone a bit to the RIGHT of an American democrat.
“Democrats are socialists who don’t like to be called ‘socialist’. That is the only difference.”
Socialist is the new Liberal.
They both agree that the government should seize control over private property, profits, prices, and wages. There may be some disagreement over whether or not the government should actually legally own all property or just control it without owning it.
I think the primary difference is that Bernie showers and brushes his teeth less often than Hillary, and builds more bombs than Hillary.
Off subject, but this reminds me of the question: What is the difference between Obama and Putin?
A - One is a power hungry soulless Marxist tyrant, and the other is president of the Russian Federation.
islamidemocommucrats
Yaaah, so the next question would be...What’s the difference between a “socialist” and a Marxist/Leninist or a Trotskyite or a Maoist or a Pol Pot/Kim Jog Un-ist?
Now we're all used to political non-answers, but this is so devoid of meaning it could have been penned by Derrida or Lacan. It's giving me a migraine.
And they say Trump never offers specifics.
Chris Matthews needs to take a second look at Behghazi too... not knowing the difference between a socialist and a democrat is only part of her problem...
Hillary owns Benghazi:
All that matters is that Hillary didn’t get Ambassador Christopher Stevens the security upgrades he requested, that she went home and slept through the attack, that she allegedly lied to the families of the dead about the cause of the attacks (and then allegedly lied about lying to the families), and then blew up at her Congressional inquisitors when they asked for answers. Even more than Obama, Hillary owns Benghazi.
above from link:
Why can’t either DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz nor Hillary tell the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?
Perhaps because there is no longer a difference!
Why? The CPUSA and DSA long ago invaded the left wing of the Democrat party and as their % of the party grew were able to make their agenda that of the Democrat party! Their agenda has been advanced by at least four terms of stealth candidates as POTUS some accompanied by economic downturns!
J.R. Nyquist published his experiences in ~1981 - 1983 that will help you understand.
WorldNetDaily 7/22/99 J R Nyquist “… I first heard of Bill Clinton 16 years ago. Here is how it happened. I was getting a teaching credential, and one of my classes was on adolescent psychology. The professor in this course, who was a very admirable teacher, seemed to favor me. One day, after class, she invited me to a 7 p.m. meeting at the Science Lecture Hall. At the time I didn’t know she was a Marxist, and I didn’t know the meeting would be political. She said that if I cared about education in the state of California I would attend. Having the night off from work I decided on going, partly owing to curiosity. Well, I couldn’t have been more surprised if it had been a coven of witches. Arriving early at the Science Lecture Hall, I found communist literature — books and pamphlets — stacked on tables in the lobby. A visiting professor was the speaker. He gave a rousing talk on overthrowing the “dictatorship of the bourgeoisie” in America. How would this be accomplished? By taking over the Democratic Party through its left wing. The speaker said it was possible to elect a stealth socialist president, who would effect a peaceful transition to socialism during the next great economic down-turn. Capitalism would be unmasked as a bankrupt system. The people would then support a new socialist system. All businesses would be nationalized by the government and run like the Post Office. This socialist president, said the speaker, could be elected in either 1988 or 1992. The only problem was that of timing. When would the next major economic downturn hit? Some days later I went to visit my professor at her office hours. We talked about the speaker and the book he had written. We talked about Marxism and the idea of changing the system. Then, suddenly, my professor said: “We have such high hopes for this young Arkansas governor, Bill Clinton.” That was the first time I heard Bill Clinton’s name. …”
WorldNetDaily 7/22/99 J R Nyquist “… But it wasn’t the first time I’d heard this idea of taking over the left wing of the Democratic Party and electing a stealth socialist president. I’d first heard that idea in 1981, when I was a senior at the University of California. The left wing activist, Derek Shearer, came to speak on the subject of “economic democracy.” Two radical friends of mine dragged me to hear him, though I had my heart set on a game of chess that day. So I went to listen to Shearer’s talk, and I sat there in the front row, concentrating on his theory of “economic democracy,” thinking to myself: This is just like Marxism. After Shearer finished speaking I went up and asked him, point blank. “Mr. Shearer, what is the difference between Marxism and “economic democracy”? He looked at me a bit suspiciously for a second, then he said, “I probably shouldn’t say this, but there is no difference.” I had a long discussion with Shearer about why he wasn’t a forthright Marxist. He said that Marxism was unpopular with the American people, who have a knee-jerk negative reaction to words like “socialism” and “communism,” even though — according to Shearer — these are perfectly good words. Therefore, in order to win Americans over to socialist ways of thinking, you need to create a new, euphemistic language — a kind of linguistic deception. Shearer also talked about taking over the Democratic Party through its left wing and electing a stealth socialist president. As it happens, Derek Shearer is a friend of Bill Clinton…..”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.