A little tit for tat?
1 posted on
01/07/2016 4:57:07 AM PST by
McGruff
To: McGruff
This is spooling up...fast
2 posted on
01/07/2016 4:59:48 AM PST by
Dog
(..."I'm just a cook..)
To: McGruff
Seems to be a dispute whether it was actually hit
3 posted on
01/07/2016 5:03:08 AM PST by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: McGruff
4 posted on
01/07/2016 5:03:57 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act)
To: McGruff
the tat was not government sponsored.
the Iranian tat was very clintonesque action
5 posted on
01/07/2016 5:06:06 AM PST by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
To: McGruff
Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen says it will investigate allegations by Iran that it hit its embassy - @Reuters
8 posted on
01/07/2016 5:30:03 AM PST by
McGruff
(Still hoping for a Trump/Cruz 2016 ticket.)
To: McGruff
My guess is that FRussians are siding with Iran since that is who Putin sides with.
9 posted on
01/07/2016 5:35:08 AM PST by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
To: McGruff
Doesn’t appear now that the embassy was hit. But even so it seems the Saudi’s are provoking a fight. Why? Why did they execute that cleric? He’d been in jail for years. They must have known there would be a response from Iran. I’d like to know what’s really going on.
10 posted on
01/07/2016 5:45:57 AM PST by
pgkdan
(But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson