Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When stripper wells are stripped away, oil may rise
Midland Reporter-Telegram ^ | January 8, 2016 | Collin Eaton

Posted on 01/12/2016 12:57:29 PM PST by thackney

Crude oil has become so cheap it could speed the oil market to a recovery.

U.S. crude plunged on Thursday to a 12-year low, an ominous milestone for Houston's oil hub, which already has shed thousands of jobs in the 19-month oil downturn.

With crude now fetching less than $34 a barrel, about half the nation's scattered collection of 400,000 aging, nearly depleted wells may have to be shut in as their product becomes less valuable than their operating costs. Called stripper wells, these produce a negligible amount of oil individually but together account for about a tenth of U.S. output.

"They'll just get turned off," said David Pursell, a top researcher at Houston investment bank Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. "It'll get people's attention."

If crude prices languish at current levels for a few months, it could trigger a loss of 400,000 to 500,000 barrels a day of U.S. crude production this year, analysts say. That's roughly the same amount of oil Iran hopes to put back on the market this year once international sanctions are lifted. In other words, a killing blow to half of the U.S. stripper wells could help counterbalance the Iranian crude that industry stakeholders believe will be the world's largest source of increased supply this year.

Idle stripper wells also could amplify a decline in domestic oil production that's already taking place. In the U.S. Lower 48, American drillers are putting out 450,000 barrels a day less than last April, when the nation's production peaked at its highest point since 1970.

U.S. oil output growth outside of Alaska was 20 percent to 25 percent a year from 2012 to 2014 as technology advances boosted production from dense shale formations. As of October, production had grown only 1 percent from a year before.

Production growth is falling because at current prices, it costs an average $19 a barrel more to bring up crude than it's worth. In a report this week, Goldman Sachs said many U.S. drillers are reaching the point where they will have to restructure. The financial firm projected that banks this spring will cut sharply the amount of money oil companies can borrow and that 8 percent of U.S. oil explorers will go into bankruptcy by year-end. Goldman said lenders could lower shale drillers' borrowing bases by 14 percent to 30 percent during a semiannual review that begins in April.

Not covering costs

Shale drillers aren't even close to generating cash flow that covers their costs, and their cost to borrow funds has climbed, said Bill Herbert, a top analyst at Houston investment bank Simmons & Company International.

Declining production eventually will cut into an international oversupply of oil and push prices up.

"The stripper wells are part of it, but the broader narrative is that the rebalancing is happening, it's just that the market doesn't care," Herbert said. "The big wild card right now is the global economy."

Huge amount stored

At the moment, traders are fixated on the massive amount of oil stored in tanks in the U.S., Europe and Asia, and prices probably won't rise until a big portion of that is cleared out. That inventory focus was apparent this week when crude prices skidded amid fears that China's slowing economy wouldn't demand enough crude to drain those inventories.

Traders largely focused on China's slowdown and crashing financial markets, shrugging off a rising conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran that has the potential to disrupt crude supplies.

"People are concerned this will spread around the world to have an even bigger effect on oil demand," said Andy Lipow, president of Houston's Lipow Oil Associates.

On Thursday, U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude sank 70 cents to $33.27 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, its lowest settlement since 2004. Brent, the global benchmark, fell 48 cents to $33.75 a barrel on the ICE Futures Europe.

A sharp supply drop?

Stripper wells could play a key role in shrinking supplies sharply enough that inventories can decline later this year. Energy research firm Wood Mackenzie has previously estimated oil production outside the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries will drop by 700,000 barrels a day this year, with the bulk of that decline coming from U.S. shale plays in Texas and North Dakota.

But if crude prices hover below $35 a barrel for long, the world could lose 1 million barrels a day later this year, which could go a long way to easing the global oversupply, said R.T. Dukes, a senior analyst at Wood Mackenzie.

"That will help bring the market back into balance a little bit quicker," Dukes said. "Stripper wells do help provide a physical floor for crude prices."

Tudor Pickering estimates at current prices the average stripper well, which produces 2.5 barrels a day, brings in $1,800 a month but costs $2,000 a month to operate because of the cost of transporting the oil, electricity, pumps and disposing of water that comes up with the oil. Some 143,000 of those stripper wells are in Texas, with the rest in California, Oklahoma, Ohio, Kansas, Kentucky and other states.

"Iran and other Middle Eastern volumes aren't going to outstrip the declines in non-OPEC and the demand growth that we expect this year," Dukes added. "You go from that oversupply to a market that begins to teeter on the undersupplied side in less than a year from now.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: business; collapse; crash; davidpursell; energy; investment; methane; oil; opec; petroleum; stripper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: doldrumsforgop

While the mechanisms of production are different, the result, decades of low flow production is not.


21 posted on 01/12/2016 2:13:51 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“While the mechanisms of production are different, the result, decades of low flow production is not.”

Speaking as a reservoir engineer, I can say without a doubt they are not the same results.

We will see quite a different setup of strippers over the next decade.

It will be an interesting twist on how US production responds on future periods of price turbulence. As an example, a higher % of these strippers will be in the hands of larger operators in the unconventional fields, so there will be more unison on more wells than exists currently in the mom and pop operations.


22 posted on 01/12/2016 2:21:46 PM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thackney

A lot of stripper wells are intentionally drilled on top of the domes where the cost to drill and produce is almost nothing and there is no spacing requirements.

Some of those wells are only about 1000ft even less.

A guy where I live used a water well rig to drill them.


23 posted on 01/12/2016 2:25:39 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop
Speaking as a reservoir engineer

I'm all for learning more. I've a couple decades in oil/gas/petrochem work but my role is always above the ground and downstream of the christmas tree.

I can say without a doubt they are not the same results.

Then I am missing the point. Certainly not the first time.

A significant percentage of our nation's oil production is in marginal wells, hundreds of thousands of them. How will adding a a couple hundred more significantly alter our market?

24 posted on 01/12/2016 2:27:32 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

I’m confused. Are you comparing or contrasting fracking wells with conventional wells?


25 posted on 01/12/2016 2:29:46 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: thackney

low oil prices are good for the economy:

more money in the consumers’ pocket,
transportation prices go down, goods go down
all the hundreds of products using go down.

who suffers: only the oil industry who are ready fat.


26 posted on 01/12/2016 2:33:23 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

contrasting.

Do you have a specific question?


27 posted on 01/12/2016 3:03:29 PM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
"low oil prices are good for the economy:

more money in the consumers’ pocket,
transportation prices go down, goods go down
all the hundreds of products using go down.

who suffers: only the oil industry who are ready fat.
"

Agreed! We need to see $10 per barrel, until all of the junk debt runs out and beyond.

;-D


28 posted on 01/12/2016 3:13:03 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy," example of today's politico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“Then I am missing the point. Certainly not the first time.

A significant percentage of our nation’s oil production is in marginal wells, hundreds of thousands of them. How will adding a a couple hundred more significantly alter our market?

After +40 years of reserves analysis and projections, I am aware of a lot of differences in a stripper conventional well and a stripper unconventional well.

The main is the estimated tail of a horizontal unconventional is a lot, lot longer than a conventional well. This means the period being a stripper well will be much longer.

In time, the % of production from stripper wells produced in this country will therefore be a lot higher than at present.

I do not wish to get into all the details of reservoir depletion between the two types of wells, but the end result is vastly different from my perspective.

How do you think the domestic oil industry will be impacted by pricing if say, over 50% of all the produced oil is from wells that are stripper? That is the impact I am attempting(poorly it seems) to describe.


29 posted on 01/12/2016 3:15:14 PM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: familyop

$10 oil will destroy the economy.


30 posted on 01/12/2016 3:24:16 PM PST by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

You need to come down here to the oil patch and say that. You really can’t fix stupid.


31 posted on 01/12/2016 3:25:16 PM PST by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Tell that to the unemployed oilfield workers. You may get your tune changed.


32 posted on 01/12/2016 3:56:39 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

That was a specific question. Congrats on your first month at FR. You might be a little less condescending.


33 posted on 01/12/2016 3:59:06 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03; doldrumsforgop; thackney
"$10 oil will destroy the economy."

True.

Oil could crash to $10 a barrel, warn investment bank bears
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3382818/posts

Link to the whole article:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/oilprices/12094394/Oil-price-could-fall-to-10-a-barrel-warn-investment-bank-bears.html

Some of the banksters, being high tech computer users and all, have implied that they can buy out and depose the old producers, employ PhD.s in the fields and do it better. Maybe the Fed will shove more debt dollars to them for that. But wait. The fun doesn't stop with nerds learning to use tools and getting into nerd fights while attempting to do real work. Don't forget the academic/government push to put more women in such jobs. We can stock up on popcorn and watch the mad, socialist/fascist follies.


34 posted on 01/12/2016 4:21:15 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy," example of today's politico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03

So will offshoring manufacturing destroy the economy?


35 posted on 01/12/2016 4:24:26 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: familyop

There are hundreds of Free Traitorsâ„¢ that have told me numerous times it is evil to try to protect any US industry with tariffs, caps or embargoes for any reason at any time.


36 posted on 01/12/2016 4:27:05 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why does the EPA require wells be plugged when not in service?


37 posted on 01/12/2016 4:32:13 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: central_va; thackney
"Why does the EPA require wells be plugged when not in service?"

Several reasons. For one, gas leaks from natural causes already bring a number of problems. Recent natural, periodical increases in geomagnetic field and outer core/lower mantle movements (probably causing more leakage overall) are a consideration that's often incorrectly rendered into rants masquerading as research report abstracts about anthropogenic global warming.

Also, curious folks tend to put various kinds of debris down abandoned oil and water wells--bad for everyone. Also, oil is a top security priority, though mostly privately managed. and the government likes to monitor the state of reserves with as few unknowns as possible.


38 posted on 01/12/2016 4:47:35 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy," example of today's politico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Wow, try to get something to understand and the attacks ensue.

Please try a civil approach instead, and rephrase any question, at least for my benefit.

Besides, bo matter what you might think, I have been on this site in one form or the other for a number of years. You information otherwise is skewed.


39 posted on 01/12/2016 8:59:37 PM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: doldrumsforgop

Attacks? Please. It doesn’t look like I could get any useful information from you. As for a “civil” approach, your condescending and arrogant attitude did not go unnoticed. And your home page says you have been here less than one month. If you have a problem with that information, take it up with the moderators.


40 posted on 01/12/2016 10:05:27 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson