[Cincinatus' Wife]

"In 2016, James Taranto criticized Brooks' analysis of a U.S. Supreme Court case, writing that "Brooks's treatment of this case is either deliberately deceptive or recklessly ignorant."

Law professor Ann Althouse concurred that Brooks "distorts rather grotesquely" the case in question. Brooks was previously criticized for having "scrambled the actual significance of what the Supreme Court has done", as Lyle Denniston put it.

Thank you.

[Night Hides Not]

Now we know why he fits in so “seamlessly” at the NYT.