Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real

There are other facts that mitigate.

Ted’s father was a refugee from Cuba, this in and of it’s self is not important. What is important is that his mother had natural born status. What other status could she have transferred?

Secondly, the entire purpose of the natural born language was security. The newly minted country was still at risk from the British and French.

That issue is no longer front and center nor does it keep people awake at night as it did then.

Since Vattel, rights and status have changed to include women, and yes, even single women or men. One can also look back and see that the interpretation of natural born was made in 1790. That interpretation does not conflict with the assertion of natural born status for Cruz through his mother.

Since he received that status there was no need to grant citizenship by statute. That was never done.

No question that there has been various opinions and statute changes since 1790, and this has muddled the case and made it possible to challenge, but not necessarily possible to win.


26 posted on 01/15/2016 3:33:24 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat

So we have a genuine dispute of the material facts ...


30 posted on 01/15/2016 3:53:12 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson