[so_real]

Well, you can't talk about 1790 without also talking about 1795, and that just muddies the water. John Jay's children did not run for POTUS, so they are immaterial. And ... Trump's status can certainly be clarified along with Cruz's. It's probably a good idea if only to prevent Jeb and the GOPE from having both front runners declared ineligible and stealing the election ...

[Cold Heat]

Yes, the water was first muddied in 1795.

In spite of the turbulence, when you make a interpretation one of the most important things to consider is the original intent. That’s why I brought up Jay.

Nobody is going to steal the election, but Cruz could be damaged politically if people actually believe the accusations. (false perception of reality) (and so could anyone in similar circumstances)

The primary thing to consider, is that no lawsuit will ever prevail. There are a number of reasons for it, but the two primary reasons are legal standing, and the fact that this is a political argument.

There could be 100 or a thousand suits. it does not matter as none of them would have standing or legitimacy.