[lacrew]

I don’t know how SCOTUS would rule, as I don’t understand any of the underlying reasoning for this case or the bakery case. I have never understood how the power of law could be used to interfere with a private business’s decision on who to serve.

[Bob434]

[[I have never understood how the power of law could be used to interfere with a private business’s decision on who to serve]]

Wel it goes to the fact that it’s illegal for a white business to refuse to serve a black person-

Somehow gay people have turned their CHOICE of a sinful lifestyle into an ‘inheritable trait’ (ie: You can not discriminate against black folks because of their genetic traits- but homosexuality is NOT a genetic trait- but they have deceived the world into thinking that homosexuality is due the same protections that being black or indian or Mexican etc are)

The Supreme court dictated NEW law when it deemed gay marriage a right, and this elevated this willful sinful lifestyle CHOICE to the pedestal of inheritable trait, and it’s against the law to discriminate against someone who has an inheritable trait

[RightOnTheBorder]

I have never understood how the power of law could be used to interfere with a private business's decision on who to serve.

We (Americans) accepted that very premise when we allowed the Fedgov to make private racial discrimination illegal in the 60's. People who decried the CRA as a slippery slope were painted as racists (gee that sounds familiar). Unless we are willing allow all forms of private discrimination to be legal, even the kind we find odious, we will be at the mercy of government dictates.

[manc]

I don’t see the homonazis going to Mosques and muslim areas doing this, I wonder why?