Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Economic Growth Lags
Jewish World Review ^ | January 18, 2016 | Robert J. Samuelson

Posted on 01/18/2016 10:47:05 AM PST by Idaho_Cowboy

WASHINGTON -- It's only January, but what may be the year's most important book on economics has already been published. Called "The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War," it argues that we can't expect new technologies to rekindle rapid economic growth. Despite all the Internet hoopla, advances in living standards will be modest and grudging. This somber message goes to the heart of the debate about America's future.

It's not that the author, economist Robert J. Gordon of Northwestern University, dislikes technology. Just the opposite: He's fascinated by it, and almost all his 762-page masterpiece describes the huge gains, mostly derived from new technologies, that have transformed daily life since the late 1800s. Until then, writes Gordon, "life and work were risky, dull, tedious, dangerous and often either too hot or too cold."

Read more at http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0116/samuelson011816.php3#m05xIf1TKpIeiQCH.99

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
An interesting idea regarding where our aconomy might be headed in the long run.

Unmention in the article is: Why bother to invent anything when the government pays people to do that (poorly), and can out-law or regulate your invention out of existince on a whim. I suspect that takes most of the fun and profit out of it.

1 posted on 01/18/2016 10:47:05 AM PST by Idaho_Cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Another Leftist clown pimping the notion that you all should just accept this as the “new normal”

NO, we don’t have to accept this top heavy Government managed economy mess as “normal”.


2 posted on 01/18/2016 10:49:42 AM PST by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Just think where this country would be if we didn’t piss away our wealth by giving it to 3rd world countries - or helping to develop the economies of 3rd world nations to a point to where they became direct competition to the US.


3 posted on 01/18/2016 10:51:02 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (With Trump & Cruz, America can't lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy
Before washers and dryers, "washing, boiling and rinsing a single load of laundry used about 50 gallons of water," estimated an 1886 study. Housewives had to lug that water from outside, often eight to 10 times a day.

Perhaps I am being picky, but this comment is stupid.

"Before washers and dryers"?? The innovation which avoided the hauling of water is called "plumbing".

4 posted on 01/18/2016 10:51:12 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Many homes did not have indoor plumbing until well into the 20th Century.


5 posted on 01/18/2016 10:55:39 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
about 50 gallons of water," estimated an 1886 study. Housewives had to lug that water from outside, often eight to 10 times a day.

Must have helped keep them in pretty good shape.

This plumbing and electricity thing is just a passing fad anyway.

Those who are busy hauling water and stirring laundry in a cauldron are causing less trouble.

6 posted on 01/18/2016 10:56:08 AM PST by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

The cost of technology is making the average worker poorer, not richer. Cable, data, cellular and phone bills are new phenomena and are way too expensive. Have salary’s kept up with technology? If a young person forgos buying new cars, all of that communications technology they could probably retire 20 years earlier.


7 posted on 01/18/2016 10:57:19 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

We filled our washer with the garden hose.


8 posted on 01/18/2016 11:03:08 AM PST by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Never mind that you’d be crazy to hire anybody.

First of all, good luck finding a work ethic.

Second, good luck avoiding lawsuits, overburdening of paperwork, and all kinds of government-imposed fringe benefits


9 posted on 01/18/2016 11:06:14 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Before washers and dryers, “washing, boiling and rinsing a single load of laundry used about 50 gallons of water,” estimated an 1886 study. Housewives had to lug that water from outside, often eight to 10 times a day.
Perhaps I am being picky, but this comment is stupid.

“Before washers and dryers”?? The innovation which avoided the hauling of water is called “plumbing”.


Indoor plumbing mans’ best invention. I think lugging all the water around vs today's way of doing things might have an impact on the obesity rates too.
10 posted on 01/18/2016 11:09:52 AM PST by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Reduce government by 50%-75%.
Have taxes cover what the government MUST do.
Get the government OUT OF THE WAY at all levels so that The People can prosper.

Be in constructive relationships with our friends around the world. NOTHING to our enemies.

Garottes for the Progressives who brought us to this state.


11 posted on 01/18/2016 11:21:41 AM PST by Macoozie ("Estoy votando por Ted 2016!" bumper stickers available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Comparatively speaking the author may be correct. But the technology boom is just getting started. Especially as it relates to tracking every facet of all our lives...uh, for the children. Probably.


12 posted on 01/18/2016 11:52:32 AM PST by subterfuge (TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

This guy Samuelson is a typical technocratic and socialistic jerk who doesn’t understand how innovation occurs and what drove the unprecedented economic expansion in the USA and the book sounds like it’s writer doesn’t understand either. Break out your copies of “The Fountainhead” and “Atlas Shrugged” if you want to know how we got where we are and where we are going.


13 posted on 01/18/2016 12:12:48 PM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Globalization practically guaranteed this is the “new normal” permanently; unlike years ago where we were the prime manufacturer of just about everything, the Third World is now the factory of the world. Ditto for call centers, data entry, etc.


14 posted on 01/18/2016 12:17:36 PM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

The traditional family is the bedrock of American economic success. To be a man respected by others is to provide for your family. When your family is not a drag on society then the standard of living and quality of life improve.

The family is both the basic unit of good economics and the basic unit of government..of social control.


15 posted on 01/18/2016 1:08:19 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
The traditional family is the bedrock of American economic success. To be a man respected by others is to provide for your family. When your family is not a drag on society then the standard of living and quality of life improve.

That's a very good point. Too many men don't want to step up an take the initiative and many that want to can't get started due to the great Obama economy.

16 posted on 01/18/2016 2:13:00 PM PST by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

We’ve been through this before, in the 1970s and early 80s. After Carter and a Democratic Congress, we were finding “limits to growth.” Paul Erlich and the “Club of Rome” were predicting that we would run out of all resources by 2004 or so, and mass starvation would ensue.

Then we got Ronald Reagan, lower taxes, deregulation, the “surprising” collapse of the Russian communist empire, and pretty good times.

This was ruined by massive government intervention in banking and housing, which tanked the economy. Community organizer, then Senator, now President Barack Hussein Obama has always fully endorsed these policies.


17 posted on 01/18/2016 3:01:36 PM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rateh was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

“unlike years ago where we were the prime manufacturer of just about everything,”

True, but why? High US corporate income taxes hurt US manufacturing. Other countries tax their corporations less. Too powerful unions make the US manufacturing less competitive. Failure to US nuclear and other energy sources as we could, have denied us the cheap energy that would have fueled US manufacturing. Over-regulation, Obama-care, etc. have also reduced our competitiveness. It is currently illegal to export US oil, which is turning US booms to busts in energy production. Socialism is killing the economy in so many ways.

Trade improves our standard of living. That is why we do it. It works between individuals, counties, states, and between nations. In the 1950s we had trade and were very competitive. Today we take prosperity as a right and never give a thought as whether a proposed law will make us more or less competitive.


18 posted on 01/18/2016 3:29:06 PM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie

Makes too much sense. :)


19 posted on 01/18/2016 3:43:58 PM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

“The traditional family is the bedrock of American economic success.”

True. But if the janitor will just leave his family, the government will give then housing, heating assistance in winter, health-care, food stamps, and cash.


20 posted on 01/18/2016 3:46:53 PM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson