Posted on 01/20/2016 6:12:26 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts
And what is Klayman’s “standing” to sue?
Meanwhile the RICO suit against the anti planned parenthood video group will be allowed to stand I predict.
Wow...didn’t recuse themselves...
not surprised really. But that was a blatant in your face flip the bird of Clinton corruption in the face of we the people.
It’s kinda like having a democrat appointed AG go after an indictment against Mrs. Slick Willy. Ain’t gonna happen.
My internet is slow today, too!
Has Klayman appealed this? If not, he understands that he's tilting at windmills. Not that there is anything wrong with tilting at Clinton windmills. Sometimes Klayman gets lucky.
He can refile depending on how the case was dismissed. I think there’s a doc at the link with details of the dismissal. I’ll have to read it at lunch.
Great American - he’s won lots. The NY Times knows everything but will never tell anything - Klayman finds the stuff out for us or we’d know nothing.
Sorry, but this was another Klayman BS PR deal from the start.
He had no standing to bring this action. He has no current security clearance. He could never demonstrate PERSONAL damages.
I hate the Clintons, but this was BS.
It’s all PR.
He had no standing and no demonstrable personal damages.
“Gee, I might have been hurt or may be in the future” does not make for viable litigation.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) focuses on issues such as "cross-border crime, corruption, and the accountability of power".
In 2013, the consortium had 160 member journalists from 60 countries.[40] The ICIJ brings together teams of international journalists for different investigations (over 80 for Offshore leaks).(CREDIT WIKI)
================================================
REFERENCE Banks drill anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist funding teaching into the heads of all bank employees. EVERY transaction -- especially by those who are politically involved -- is subject to scrutiny.
There is no way -- categorically N.O. way -- in a Patriot-Act world that anyone could have pulled off what is alleged against the Clinton Foundation. Unless it was a Clinton, acting with the express complicity of some very high-ups at some very big banks.
Every suspect transaction will have a report filled out and filed about it. If it involves international transfers and shady characters (think of the latest list of the Friends of Bill) the issues - each and every one -- would be escalated to senior management.
The bank reports themselves are required to be on file for 5 years. Discussion of such reports -- even their existence -- is strictly controlled and generally forbidden. Yet they remain on record.
I suppose it's conceivable that suspicious activity reports were duly passed on to OCC (bank oversight agencies)....and whomever else has jurisdiction and there they were buried. But some bankers still know about them. Unless they weren't filed, and that itself is a crime under the applicable law. (hat tip 9th Life)
Sure, when they are dead.
That is what I was thinking. It is clearly a conflict of interest.
How can this judge not recuse himself? Wow.
“He had no standing and no demonstrable personal damages.”
I am not even going to try to explain the concept of “standing” to Freepers who are convinced that the judge is in the bag for Clinton. Perhaps, but that doesn’t doesn’t change the fundamental rules on standing.
Remember the “We don’t need no lawyers” crowd
All the advice they will ever need they get from bartenders, hairdressers, cab drivers..... and the ‘net.
:)
If that is the standard for recusal, then no federal judge would be able to preside over a case involving the administration that appointed the judge to the bench, and the federal court system would not be able to function.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.