LOL, yes, it was his job to argue before the Supreme Court, but he could have argued against the Bill of Rights, if the State had asked him to, but that would not have happened anyway.
He actually fought against “W” his former boss, in the Medellin case, on states rights, and won that.
Your logic has no logic in it.
That is not true. Cruzs’ worked for the state Texas and defended the state of Texas before the SC. Had he not the state of Texas would have fired him. Also it was a no brainer that the USSC would rule that the USSC is the ultimate authority over US law, not the World Court. W is and always was a fool.