[DoughtyOne]

Always a good idea to prove corruption if you charge it.

This can backfire on a guy.

[SeaHawkFan]

And exactly what conservative needs further evidence of corruption in D.C.?

Some statements need no explanation or defending.

[skeeter]

Well I don't see any direct charge of corruption against anyone in particular here.

But its beyond debate that the Washington DC clique is corrupt.

[SmokingJoe]

It hasn't backfired on Trump yet. And he has yet to prove even a single one of his dastardly attacks on Cruz.
Further Cruz is exactly right. Bob Dole is the GOPe. He attacked Reagan when Reagan was running for president using exactly the same language he is using against Ted Cruz. The result? Reagan won an unprecedented 49 states.

[usafa92]

Seriously. I liked Cruz at the start of this campaign. But he’s really starting to look like the crazy neighbor who thinks his house is bugged. Trump has played him beautifully. Whatever Cruz says these days reinforces the “maniac” perception. All Cruz does is complain and moan about the cartel and the establishment. We know they are corrupt. What is Cruz going to do to get anything done except complain about it?

[jeffersondem]

“Always a good idea to prove corruption if you charge it.”

Are you speaking of proving something at the level of the jury box or the ballot box?

Regardless, tell me how poor Mr. Eric Holder, and Lois Lerner, and Bill Clinton have been wrongly judged. Tell me.