Posted on 01/26/2016 11:48:22 AM PST by WhiskeyX
Corruption: We know at least 1,340 of Hillary Clinton’s personal emails contain classified material. This was no accident. Someone deliberately moved highly sensitive content from a secure network to her private account. Is that person a criminal?
The smoking guns indicating there has been profound misconduct in the handling of State Department email communications have become “a growing arsenal,†we wrote last week. “If a ‘smoking gun’ means catching (Clinton) in a flat lie or putting national security at risk or being unbelievably, if not criminally, negligent in her handing of classified information,†then, we said, at least seven have been found so far.
Today it’s looking as if there are at least eight.
And this most recent gun looks particularly menacing.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
I believe you have to go to school and pass the course to be allowed on the SIPR Net.
This wasn’t a case of “Oopsie!”.
They knew damn well what they were doing.
It’s espionage and espionage gets people hung.
Accountable? Now that there is funny stuff.
It has been a very long time since I dealt with this, but back in the early 1990’s, one could not simply open up a secure message, cut out content, and paste it into a new message to be sent non-secure.
This is because it was prohibited (and foolish) to have one computer hooked up to both systems (and what would be the reason to even do it).
So this is not at all like me opening up an email on my work account and re-sending it via a gmail account etc.
Instead, somebody had to try very hard to do this. I really can’t imagine the secure computers even being in the same room as unsecure computers..ie no unsecure network connections anywhere near the secure computers. Maybe they moved info back and forth with thumb drives (Bradley Manning demonstrated that the federal government hasn’t figured out how to disable USB ports).
The guiding light of Hillary’s WHOLE LIFE is the US Presidency.
And it’s going to come within a whisker of her claws AND SHE WILL FAIL.
The WHOLE reason for her life will be gone.
THIS IS GOING TO BE SOOOOOO FUN...!!!!
I’ll tell you what isn’t funny.
What isn’t funny is the constant surrender on any thread about Hillary Clinton.
Please tell me how your post is in any way beneficial to conservatives on Free Republic.
The other departments involved can do little with regard to how State mishandles their own products, but they can and should stop sharing materials until State gets its collective feces in one foot covering. Until then they should expect everything they give State to be leaked to our enemies.
Years from now we will find out that our enemies had full access to the Clinton server, if not spies on her staff. It will be this decade's John Walker scandal.
That someone(s) will be subject to arrest and possibly Arkanside if they dare to speak.
She lies like the wind blows .. Cold and hard.
She disses those who she sacrificed..
And backstabbed..
From Broadrick to Benghazi..
She hits more targets than she misses.. Ask Vince.
Concern trolls have said much in threads about Hillary. There are feminists and other anti-competition interests in both political parties.
Hillary is through. She was obviously done, when she lost to Obama in her last primary.
Not school but you do sign an NDA and are briefed on what you can and cannot do. And every year you’re briefed again on proper handling of classified information. And then briefed separately if any incidents come up that makes them do training again.
I don’t think it’s surrender, it’s more like the absurdity of any action occurring. I suppose it would be akin for the calls to impeach the lyin’ king. Way too late.
I have a question. If someone copy/pasted pieces of top secret or confidential information, and sent it to Hitlery’s personal email, is that the same thing as altering a government document?
If she subsequently opened, and responded to such a document, would that make her an accessory to altering a government document?
Would such an action add to whatever charges might be levied against her?
Reading those reports of the reporters being charged with altering a government document in Texas made me wonder about the reported altered secret docs at the state department, and Hillary’s participation in it.
While she was SOS, there would occasionally be a random act of journalism, and somebody would point out that a company or group that donated heavily to Clinton’s charity benefitted from a recent State Dept determination. Classic quid pro quo. My guess is Hillary wanted to give full access to info to her team of lawyers and political hacks, so they could skillfully craft policy to suit her bribery scheme needs.
A more troubling possibility is she was outright selling government secrets. These are the same Clintons that released rocket info to the Chicoms in the 90s, so I don’t put anything past them.
What, you don’t think they’ll drag her back out in 2020?
Some feel she won't be indicted or prosecuted...I do.
This was a very serious national security breach. In fact, it is likely foreign intelligence accessed some of our state secrets because of the actions of Hillary.
I will pop a top the day she’z indicted. Be a good day for America, indeed.
If it were anyone else, she’d be in prison already.
Thank you for that.
The clintons have skated on a lot, that is true, but the subhuman piece of filth was impeached after all. And “inevitable” hillary slut-whore, diseased maggot piece of reeking filth, DID have her ugly f’ing face kicked in by a little boy who had been in the senate for all of 10 minutes before running for the presidency. So I have little patience for all freepers who passionately worship hillary’s “inevitable” power that will have her ruling the world for all time.
Those same people called her inevitable 8 years ago, and we see how that worked out.
rktman, what do you mean by “constant surrender”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.