To: Red Badger
I don’t see where, at either link, this is explained:
“It’s fantastic. It is a game-changer for us. We’ve been wanting this to happen,” DeLorean CEO Stephen Wynne said. “That was a green light to go back into production. That was prohibited. It was against the law to do it.”
WHAT was against the law? WHAT changed to now allow whatever “it” is?
19 posted on
01/27/2016 12:34:44 PM PST by
Roos_Girl
(The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
To: Roos_Girl
To: Roos_Girl
âItâs fantastic. It is a game-changer for us. Weâve been wanting this to happen,â DeLorean CEO Stephen Wynne said. âThat was a green light to go back into production. That was prohibited. It was against the law to do it.â
WHAT was against the law? WHAT changed to now allow whatever âitâ is?
Yea, that's the main thing I noticed/was wondering. Probably some kind of trademark bullshit, but if he bought out the tooling/parts/name from the original builder, I don't see why that would matter.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson