Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/29/2016 2:39:35 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Enlightened1
Right!

She can say that knowing full well they will never be made public.

2 posted on 01/29/2016 2:43:14 PM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Don’t see why they can’t be released.

The Secretary of Treason says they were never classified, so release ‘em.


3 posted on 01/29/2016 2:44:05 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

” appear to involve information from a published news article.”

I can still remember seeing a short column cut from the NYT pinned to a cork board in the office at NSA stamped Top Secret ‘CW’ ...


5 posted on 01/29/2016 2:45:41 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Hillary’s got a real “tar baby” now! Someone should start a wagering site on the date when she’s indicted!


6 posted on 01/29/2016 2:45:57 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
Even if these Top Secret/SCI emails are "innocuous" and are in the public domain, what about the other 1340 emails? Are they also "innocuous?" What a coincidence. All the emails Hillary stored on her illegal, private server are "innocuous."

We know that Hillary conducted business exclusively on her server, so there are two choices here, of which exactly one is true:

1. Hillary sent and received no classified emails, which means she did absolutely nothing and wasted millions in taxpayer money during her tenure as SoS.

2. Hillary is guilty of hundreds of felonies for improper handling of classified documents.

Those are your choices, Hillary. Which one is it?

7 posted on 01/29/2016 2:46:35 PM PST by thesharkboy (posting without reading the article since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Yeah release them so the State Department can be guilty of the same crime.


8 posted on 01/29/2016 2:46:51 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

That’s bs and they know it. Just trying to save Iowa. If she wins Iowa, she may be able to be seen as the only viable candidate.

If she loses and is not seen as having a chance to beat Trump, they may throw her to the wolves and, while there is still time, introduce someone else. Biden/Warren?


9 posted on 01/29/2016 2:47:33 PM PST by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

“America is sick and tired of hearing about your dam emails” Bernie said

“Cruz is an anchor baby” Trump

These are some brilliant people.


10 posted on 01/29/2016 2:47:37 PM PST by corbe (mystified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

11 posted on 01/29/2016 2:48:58 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]



Please help make FR's voice louder.


Truth, Justice, and the American Way.

click the bottom graphic and support them

13 posted on 01/29/2016 2:51:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

THE UNITED STATES is a country of LAWS. If this lady broke the laws, then PROCEED according to due process PLEASE?


14 posted on 01/29/2016 2:52:14 PM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Well good gosh - what else is the campaign going to say? Continue to protest and people will believe that you have nothing to hide and have always been telling the truth. She knew some of these would NEVER be released but she’s making a game of it. Someone way, somehow the Clintons always have it their way. Something was missing in most of our educations!!!


15 posted on 01/29/2016 2:53:29 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Our foreign enemies could release them.


17 posted on 01/29/2016 2:56:47 PM PST by Mark (Obama Care is now DEMOCRAT CARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
have been called "innocuous" by certain intelligence officials.

Be nice to know what the background of these mysterious "officials" is.

18 posted on 01/29/2016 2:57:48 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

DISASTER!

OBAMY ADMIN says 22 e-mails are too sensitive to release!!!


20 posted on 01/29/2016 3:00:08 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE MAKE YOUR DONATION TODAY - GO MONTHLY - JOIN CLUB 300!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Seems Hillary had all critical information on her computer.


21 posted on 01/29/2016 3:03:23 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (how many laws has Cruz sponsored that have become law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
We firmly oppose the complete blocking of the release of these emails. Since first providing her emails to the State Department more than one year ago, Hillary Clinton has urged that they be made available to the public. We feel no differently today.

Yeah, release them to show Joe and Jane Sixpack that they are benign, yoga-scheduling emails. Otherwise this is nothing more than a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (TM).

22 posted on 01/29/2016 3:03:47 PM PST by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
Nothing is going to happen to Hillary. She is under the communists leftists umbrella of protection. King Obama would never throw her under the bridge for fear he will be exposed at America's worst terrorists.
26 posted on 01/29/2016 3:06:54 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
We firmly oppose the complete blocking of the release of these emails. Since first providing her emails to the State Department more than one year ago, Hillary Clinton has urged that they be made available to the public. We feel no differently today.

The Clinton campaign knows damn well that these emails CAN'T be released because they contain extremely sensitive information. Because of this, they figure they can issue a statement like this, then tell the American people: Hey!, we have nothing to hide! In fact, we urged the government to release the emails to the public!"

31 posted on 01/29/2016 3:15:04 PM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

The Intelligence Community has decided these are too sensitive to be releasesd .... not the State Departmen & it’s certainly not “bureacratic infighting”. For some good details:

Via Hot Air:
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/29/oh-my-some-hillary-e-mails-too-damaging-to-release/

What happens when redactions become insufficient to cover the damage to national security from Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized and unsecured home-brew e-mail system? Get ready to find out. Fox News’ Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne exclusively report that the intelligence community will prevent the State Department from releasing at least 22 e-mails in the current tranche, because not even redactions can prevent damage to national security from their release:

The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging” to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding.

The decision to withhold the documents in full, and not provide even a partial release with redactions, further undercuts claims by the State Department and the Clinton campaign that none of the intelligence in the emails was classified when it hit Clinton’s personal server.

Fox News is told the emails include intelligence from “special access programs,” or SAP, which is considered beyond “Top Secret.” A Jan. 14 letter, first reported by Fox News, from intelligence community Inspector General Charles McCullough III notified senior intelligence and foreign relations committee leaders that “several dozen emails containing classified information” were determined to be “at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, AND TOP SECRET/SAP levels.”

It’s the presence of SAP information which has the intel community seeking a halt on further releases of these specific e-mails, apparently comprising seven different threads. The problem, Herridge and Browne report, is that the lack of effective security on both the internet connection and the server itself all but guarantees that others have copies of Hillary’s entire system. Publishing the e-mails with the SAP redactions would allow those with their own Clintonemail.com backup to easily find the information and discover the value of the information they have — essentially providing a map to the needles in the haystack.

But, readers might ask, isn’t that true of all the redacted e-mails? Indeed it is, but apparently the sensitivity of those programs didn’t rise to the level of what the intel community found in this tranche. That gives us a very clear picture of just how much damage Hillary and her team did to national security with their desire to pervert legitimate Congressional oversight for the State Department.


32 posted on 01/29/2016 3:17:04 PM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson