Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian asylum ruling paves way for deportation of infants
Reuters ^ | Colin Packham, Matt Siegel

Posted on 02/03/2016 1:25:38 PM PST by Lorianne

Australia's High Court threw out a challenge to offshore immigration detention camps on Wednesday, clearing the way for the deportation of dozens of infants born in Australia to detained asylum seekers.

The court rejected a legal test case brought by an unidentified Bangladeshi woman that challenged Australia's right to deport detained asylum seekers to the tiny South Pacific island nation of Nauru.

The detention centre on Nauru houses about 500 people and has been widely criticised by the United Nations and human rights agencies for harsh conditions and reports of systemic child abuse.

The Bangladeshi woman was on a boat intercepted by Australian authorities in October 2013. She was detained on Australia's remote Christmas Island and later sent to Nauru.

She gave birth to a daughter after she was transferred to Australia for medical treatment in 2014 and has remained there with her child

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/03/2016 1:25:38 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It seems like every Western country in the world is waking up and wising up on immigration other than the good old USA.


2 posted on 02/03/2016 1:27:08 PM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi!


3 posted on 02/03/2016 1:27:55 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This judge is smarter than most Judges.
Good decision.


4 posted on 02/03/2016 1:28:09 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Australian asylum ruling paves way for deportation of infants

Dishonest Journalism. Deliberately putting forth a straw man and disguising it as a "news story."

5 posted on 02/03/2016 1:31:13 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Why didn’t the woman get in the immigration line and apply legally? This is it, the illegals always think their better than anyone else. They have to butt in front of the line, or in this case just barge right into other countries while totally expecting the taxpayers to provide for them. Why didn’t she barge into an African or Muslim country? Is it because those countries do not provide welfare?


6 posted on 02/03/2016 1:41:23 PM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The headline implies the infants will be deported and thrown to the wolves. The first paragraph says the infants belong to detained asylum seekers.

The true context is that infants enjoy no special birthright protection in Australia and are being deported with their parents.

7 posted on 02/03/2016 2:08:33 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Australia used to have birthright citizenship like we do, but they changed the law when they saw it was being abused. So did the UK, Ireland and New Zealand. European countries don’t have that law. The only two First World countries with automatic birthright citizenship are the U.S. and Canada. Time to scrap it ourselves.


8 posted on 02/03/2016 3:14:24 PM PST by River Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: River Hawk

I thought Canada already dumped theirs.


9 posted on 02/03/2016 3:52:31 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: River Hawk

My mistake. They still have it.


10 posted on 02/03/2016 3:58:10 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson