No. Roberts did pro bono work for gay rights groups.
The red flags were all over the place but everyone thought that Bush and Cruz could do no wrong.
“Roberts did pro bono work for gay rights groups.”
Cruz accepts money from large sum homosexual donors. Is that enough to establish a pattern?
Though her stock has fallen around here, Anne Coulter was one of the few to express concern about Roberts' skimpy record.
But unfortunately, other than that that, we don't know much about John Roberts. Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Never. Not ever.
She nailed that one.
Cruz had to choose the lesser evil, as I recall. Saying that Cruz had something to do with Roberts’ name being presented is simply false. It’s all on lamebrain George W, the guy who picked Harriet Miers.
Trump and Cruz are our two best options, no doubt.
I like that Cruz is not for even a touchback amnesty at this point.
But from pushing Roberts to flogging the TPA and giving it a critical vote and then of course his pro-legalization, “out of the shadows”, statements around the time of the Gang of Eight bill, I think he’s given us enough to doubt his campaign promises. He’ll put spin on whatever he does—but you can’t be too sure about what it is he’ll do.
Wanna bet he’s a “closet queer” too?