Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Ted Cruz's Preemptive Rejection of a Supreme Court Nominee Is Illegitimate
The Atlantic ^ | February 13, 2016 | Conor Friedersdorf

Posted on 02/14/2016 6:34:31 AM PST by SMGFan

The GOP presidential candidate—and at least two of his rivals—are acting as if the meaning of the Constitution changes depending on the timing of the next election. Antonin Scalia is dead. Is it legitimate for the Republican-controlled Senate to refrain from confirming a replacement for the late Supreme Court justice until a new president is elected, as Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson and others on the right have urged? Or does the Senate have an obligation to approve a qualified nominee put forth by President Obama, as many on the left argued as soon as news of the death broke?

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 114th; bhoscotus; cruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
If Ginsburg had passed away a year ago , most of the GOP Senators would have confirm an Obama choice?
1 posted on 02/14/2016 6:34:31 AM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Tables turned, what would Harry Reid do? Do the same.


2 posted on 02/14/2016 6:35:56 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

If Cruz were president, I’m sure the Democrats would hasten to approve someone he would nominate with 10 months left in his term. When pigs fly….


3 posted on 02/14/2016 6:37:02 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

4 posted on 02/14/2016 6:37:36 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

If the GOP can’t stand up to this illegitimate administration when the nation’s very existence hangs in the balance, they have no reason to exist.


5 posted on 02/14/2016 6:37:51 AM PST by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects; starve the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Estrada was qualified. Bork was qualified.


6 posted on 02/14/2016 6:38:07 AM PST by doug from upland (Some of you keep telling yourself -- Romney would have been as bad or worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The GOP Senate had better block ANY nominee

This is the hill they die on.

Whether they like it or not


7 posted on 02/14/2016 6:39:06 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

None of that matters, we are literally at war with the left, or rather they have been warring against America for a long time. We must not let them place a justice, period.


8 posted on 02/14/2016 6:39:27 AM PST by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
I wrote that it's God's will that Scalia passed at this time instead of last year.

Ginsberg and Scalia were best buds. Don't be surprised if she resigns.

A court of 7? There is no minimum that I know of...but I believe the max is 12.

9 posted on 02/14/2016 6:40:03 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

F’ the Atlantic.


10 posted on 02/14/2016 6:40:53 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

When you look at the Kenyan’s two justices sitting on the court, it only makes sense for Americans to say, “No mas! No mas!” Stop the freak show.


11 posted on 02/14/2016 6:44:17 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (02-13-2016. America's Blackest Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
Is it legitimate for the Republican-controlled Senate to refrain from confirming a replacement for the late Supreme Court justice until a new president is elected,

Yes.

Or does the Senate have an obligation to approve a qualified nominee put forth by President Obama,

No.

That was easy. What do I win?

5.56mm

12 posted on 02/14/2016 6:44:19 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Too bad they are more interested in a hit piece than in what is best for “We The People” and the country.


13 posted on 02/14/2016 6:44:53 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Revising my post 9.....9 justices, 8 are associates, 6 is a quorum


14 posted on 02/14/2016 6:45:22 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

This is political war.

If the GOPe has not learned that their rank and file have mutinied and are prepared to leave them on an uninhabited island, they had better learn that and damned fast.

They cave on this and I and millions of others will actively promote any and all independents just to destroy that spineless organization.

The enemy within is more destructive, deceptive, treacherous, and immoral than the enemy without.


15 posted on 02/14/2016 6:46:10 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Carter...Reagan...Bush...Clinton....Bush....Carter....BUSH? / CLINTON? STOP THE INSANITY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

ALL so-called “progressives” should have always been excluded from any office where they swear to uphold the Constitution. Their ideology is incapable of honoring it. They have trod it underfoot and with their lawlessness they have brought the nation ever closer to its demise.


16 posted on 02/14/2016 6:47:49 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

I have a simple solution to the whole issue.

Ginsburg should retire.

And the court should just have 7 judges instead of 9.


17 posted on 02/14/2016 6:48:03 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
The GOP Senate had better block ANY nominee This is the hill they die on. Whether they like it or not

I'll bet no one is more sad/scared over Scalia's death than the RINOs in the senate. My prediction is that they'll approve Obama's nominee, but the vote will be close to try to make it look good to the voters. This will be the issue that I hope will finally make it clear to conservatives that it is useless to vote for a RINO as the lesser of two evils.

18 posted on 02/14/2016 6:48:31 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

Reid would have the support of his party behind him. Cruz will not because he has not created good working relationships with more than a few of his Senate Republican peers. Most of them can’t stand him.


19 posted on 02/14/2016 6:50:10 AM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
The Atlantic

The view from the over edge of the world's liberals

20 posted on 02/14/2016 6:50:23 AM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson