Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am sure that you are correct! Unfortunately, what is going to matter is not what we think, but what a panel of judges from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decides.


30 posted on 02/15/2016 7:34:24 PM PST by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: fireman15

Already two states have said he is eligible, including Illinois.


31 posted on 02/15/2016 7:35:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: fireman15

No Federal Court can take this case, for at least three reasons:

1. Nothing to adjudicate: There must be a justiciable dispute; “The parties must not be seeking an advisory opinion.”

2. No standing: A party to a suit must have suffered actual injury. Where’s the injury?

3. Political Question: “The suit must not be seeking judgment upon a political question.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justiciability


33 posted on 02/15/2016 7:42:16 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson