Posted on 02/25/2016 7:42:56 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
Wait, are you talking about Trump, whose mother was Scottish?
Excellent headline on the article. It tells why you should vote for someone as opposed to articles that tell you who NOT to vote for. People hate being told what to do; sorta pisses them off!
However, I didn’t read the article because my mind is made up. I am voting for TRUMP.
Hardly. More pointedly... when it comes to wetbacks, do not trust Hispanic politicians.
Yes, that comes with the territory. I'm concerned even more about Conservatives needing to eviscerate the new Dear Leader, when he makes deals shifting to the left.
The enemedia is enemy regardless of a Constitutional Conservative or a bombastic populist.
Cruz “character”:
1. Phony summonses mailed out, scaring people to vote for Cruz.
2. Claiming Carson quit, presinc captains told voters “vote for Cruz”
3. Campaigning in the 800 churches, showing video “vote for me” with his preacher/father stomping for him. Rafael Cruz is a 7 Mountain Dominionist and believes his son is the anointed one.
4. “Brilliant” lawyer, did not know he was Canadian citizen and that he is not Natural Born Citizen, not eligible for office of P or VP.
5. Making phony video advertising with lies about opponents.
6. Phony video about Rubio - Obama.
7. 7 Mountain Dominionist Church = Christian???
Just enough to beat Trump in IA, apologize, rinse and repeat?
Liar is the polite term for this Cuban. His father was pro-communist in Cuba, imprisoned by Batista, but now he is refugee?
IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN
(Oct. 18, 2009) The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the United States has given the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is. Since being a natural born citizen is an objective qualification and requirement of office for the U.S. President (and VP), it is important for all U.S. Citizens to understand what this term means.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
Applies to Cruz and Rubio, both at the time not born to US citizens and on US soil.
Excellent headline on the article. It tells why you should vote for someone as opposed to articles that tell you who NOT to vote for. People hate being told what to do; sorta pisses them off!
However, I didn’t read the article because my mind is made up. I am voting for TRUMP.
Thank you for your racist comment. I’m sure all the Hispanics fighting in the U.S. military appreciate your attitude. Any other races we shouldn’t trust in politics? Allen West? Clarence Thomas?
If Trump picks a Hispanic for VP, will you refuse to vote for the ticket?
LOL, you’re goofy.
CNN lied, and Donald Trump repeated that lie for personal gain.
As for the mailers, I have seen that exact same mailer many times on the West Coast. I hope the Cruz campaign is smart enough not to use that mailer any more, but all in all it is a tiny mole hill that his enemies have struggled mightily to turn into a mountain. They briefly succeeded, but now people are treating that mailer for what it is...a nothing sandwhich!
Next!
Ah, I see from the erudition in your post, you are a Trump supporter!
Don't be surprised if we actually see, "in the meantime, please step back out of the way and watch as Trump does deals with Pelosi and Schumer."
Reagan did deals with Tip O'Neill.
Seems people forget what it means to lead and bring people together to do great things and bring the country forward. Reagan knew.
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."
– Ronaldus Maximus Reagan
Ted Cruz supports illegal alien amnesty.
TED CRUZ: U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing, 5/21/13:
"And I'd like to make a final point to those advocacy groups that are very engaged in this issue and rightly concerned about addressing our immigration system and, in particular, about addressing the situation for the 11 million who are currently in the shadows. If this amendment is adopted to the current bill, the effect would be that those 11 million under this current bill would still be eligible for RPI status. They would still be eligible for legal status and indeed, under the terms of the bill, they would be eligible for LPR status as well so that they are out of the shadows, which the proponents of this bill repeatedly point to as their principal objective to provide a legal status for those who are here illegally to be out of the shadows. This amendment would allow that happen, but what it would do is remove the pathway to citizenship so that there are real consequences that respect the rule of law and that treat legal immigrants with the fairness and respect they deserve. And a second point to those advocacy groups that are so passionately engaged. In my view, if this committee rejects this amendment, and I think everyone here views it as quite likely this committee will choose to reject this amendment, in my view, that decision will make it much, much more likely that this entire bill will fail in the House of Representatives. I don't want immigration reform to fail. I want immigration reform to pass. And so I would urge people of good faith on both sides of the aisle, if the objective is to pass common sense immigration reform that secures the borders, that improves legal immigration, and AMNESTY: that allows those who are here illegally to come in out of the shadows.Then we should look for areas of bipartisan agreement and compromised to come together. And this amendment, I believe, if this amendment were to pass, the chances of this bill passing into law would increase dramatically."
In repose to my # 9 Post.
You need to declare this a "Cruz Safe Zone" thread as I've heard on Trump rally threads that I commented on weeks back.
The insinuation is I lie I like a Cool-Aid Drinking Trump Supporter.
Sorry it took me so long, had to go back to the 16th, but there ya go Sir!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
