If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
If anyone has listened to Trump’s explanation you might find a)unwavering support for Israel b)a desire to be an objective but fair deal maker. This is not nuanced.
I think the neutral stance is pure genius. Don't know what the article said but Trumps position was equally as powerfull as his I will not let people die in the streets
" promise.
when he gets the nod, he’ll probably go full on pro-Israel. I think by mentioning the Palestinians at all, he’s simply courting the libertarians/Rand Paul supporters who sympathize with the Palestinians. But anyone who knows Trump knows he’s pro-Israel, more so than Rand, or Uppity Hussein.
How does DJT propose to make a ‘deal’ that does not involve the total extermination of all the Jews in Israel and the state itself as the Palestinians charter demands?
How does he propose to negotiate with the Palestinians that refuse to negotiate? And when cornered into such negotiations never honor anything they agree to?
What that revels is that DJT has ZERO knowledge of the problems and issues in the ME, and just talks through his hat saying what he hopes everyone wants to hear.
Part of successful deal making is not to reveal all your hand before you start. Pretend not to take a side, even if you’re pro-Israel
Neutrality would be an improvement.