Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 28 February 2016

Various driveby media television networks ^ | 28 February 2016 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

[Alas Babylon!]

The Talk Shows

February 28th, 2016

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump; GOP Presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Cruz, Trump, Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders; Republican presidential candidate John Kasich.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Cruz, Sanders, Trump.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Cruz, Sanders; New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Cruz, Christie, Kasich; Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.

Sharyl Attkisson’s Full Measure A sobering investigation into the cost of medical services, where the difference can be THOUSANDS for the EXACT SAME PROCEDURE! How can they vary so widely, even within the same city?

[Alas Babylon!]

As always, soliciting FReeper comments, observations, and opinions.

[Alas Babylon!]

This is the Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread Ping List! If you want to be on it, reply to this post or FReepmail me (in case I miss it). If you want to be taken off, simply send me a FReepmail.

Ted Cruz on ALL five shows!

[Alas Babylon!]

C-SPAN Radio, available on the net also, click here, broadcasts all five Sunday talk shows starting at 12:00 noon Eastern, as follows:

12:00 PM - 1:00 PM NBC's "Meet the Press"

1:00 PM - 2:00 PM ABC's "This Week"

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM "Fox News Sunday"

3:00 PM - 4:30 PM CNN's "State of the Union"

4:30 PM - 5:00 PM CBS's "Face The Nation"

Listen at the link above WHILE you FReep! Also, Sharyl Attkinson’s Full Measure: Watch live at 9:30 EST. It was a federal research study conducted on extremely premature babies. So, why do their parents now say they had no idea about the true dangers involved? We examine “informed consent,” on the next Full Measure.

[Alas Babylon!]

Here are the email addresses or web pages for commenting to the weekend talk shows:

Meet the Press Meet the Press mailbox (web page for comments)

Face the Nation ftn@cbsnews.com

Fox News Sunday FNS@foxnews.com

ABC This Week thisweek@abc.com

CNN State of the Union CNN State of the Union (web page for comments)

[GotMojo]

where’s Cuban boy?

[Alas Babylon!]

“The Sunday Morning Bray”, by Bray!

My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.1 John 3:18 KJV

Is any science trustworthy? The Marxists accuse conservatives of being Flat Earthers who are anti-science to dehumanize their view, but the Marxists are actually the ones who do not follow the true science model. Science requires a skepticism of its theories until it becomes a fact beyond doubt which very few things are in the subjective sciences.

We have watched the deterioration of science over the past fifty years in all of the soft sciences which would be anything outside of the technical and engineering sciences. When man is able to manipulate the data it no longer is science and then becomes an agenda or politics driven. This fall of scientific curiosity coincided with the acceptance of evolution and the elimination of creation as a state controlled belief. When evolution became settled science without any real hard evidence it became the model for all scientific theory.

Politics corrupts everything it touches and evolution is now a purely political agenda to promote Marxism. It is designed to take God out of the creation of mankind and make science or random repetitions as the prime force of the universe. Their problem is that outside of the models and square pegs in round holes being hammered into place, the theory has no physical proof to backup the theory. There is no clear fossil record of a transitory species in existence which there should be trillions of random species crossing from one evolution to the other moving towards man and why has man not evolved?

This is the corruption which science accepts and is the foundation for every soft science theory we have accepted as truth. Once the science is settled then it is no longer able to be challenged no matter how much proof counters it. Science continues to become a consensus gathering movement similar to voting for one theory over another becoming less and less scientific proof leading to abominations like Global Warming, Acid Rain, Ice Age, Ozone hole growth, DDT killing birds and other frauds which have been disproved once the agenda has been promoted. These were all modeled in scientific research and then used to promote Marxism to punish capitalism and regulations were passed to eliminate whatever industry they wanted stopped. This is what science has evolved into as a political weapon to promote an academic and political agenda.

Now science through instant communication has become a debating society between people who agree with each other. Since they are 97% liberal socialists who believe Marxism is a fairer system than Capitalism they are going to advance their agenda through their branch of science. This brings into question all sciences and what is the agenda of those promoting it? If you cannot trust science in general how can you accept anything they tell you without looking at the negative effects?

We are watching so much of this falling apart with this election. All of the prognosticators have been completely wrong with their predictions. Trump and Cruz have blown apart political science in a way we have never seen before. The entire political formula has been destroyed leaving the political scientists with no explanation why Jeb Bush was not able to win with his ability to spend ten times what his competitors spent.

By the political formula Jeb should have won this going away. He had name familiarity as well as the money and organization to overwhelm everyone in the race. All of the political scientists agreed that he was the presumptive winner and it was only a matter of how big rather than if. They had reached their consensus and the election was one of the easiest to predict in history as both Parties lined up to have their dream Clinton/Bush battle of Party dynasties.

The way political science works since Lincoln is every neighborhood is organized by a Party member who has all of the names of the Party members in the neighborhood as well as every other voter and nonvoter. This is organized through a chain of command similar to the military and everyone is reached out to and asked to help with the campaigns. This way both Parties control the vote and everyone is in line and help the preferred candidate.

From a campaign standpoint their formula is they have all of the Party members doing the work they believe is required to win elections. If you knock on ten thousand doors and make a hundred thousand calls and have so many millions of dollars worth of commercials you win the election for a small district. That formula worked in the last century and has no bearing with today. With cell phones and caller ID phone calls are completely useless.

The big fraud is the value of commercials although the campaign managers make millions off them. When you have 300 channels which ones are you going to spend your millions on? Even if the voter is on the channel they may have it recorded and be blasting through it and even if they do see it they are not buying the grainy picture of your competitor and can decide on the internet who they trust.

The good news is the establishment candidates are pouring hundreds of millions down the toilet and getting nothing in return. In Jeb’s case he was such a bad candidate even if the old science worked he would not have been able to win as we are seeing from Hillary surviving by huge amounts of money and Party organization. It also helps her she has a hundred year old Bolshevik as a competitor.

Donald Trump and to a certain point Ted Cruz has turned their backs on the system and have written their own formula. Cruz unfortunately has followed too much of the system in the need to make his name known. He tried using the old Lincoln formula and counting on commercials to carry his message. He fell for the negative campaign method and that was the kiss of death. He needed to bring a positive message and he never addressed his Natural Birth issue thinking ignoring it would make it disappear and in the back of people’s minds it never left. He could break the habits he was taught how to win and trusted bad science. His mistake in Iowa will never go away and why he is about to lose.

Donald Trump has rewritten the election process. He of course had star name status similar to Reagan, but ignored the consensus for winning elections. He ran the bare minimum commercials and preferred to call in on every news show across the spectrum. Rather than Town Halls he preferred small stadiums and used public theater to get all the cameras to reach his voters as well a huge internet presence. Most of all he had fun and kept his message positive without giving the tired stump speeches and rather prefers a free form delivery.

None of the old media scientists saw this coming and have dismissed him even as he is about to win the nomination going away. They refuse to see what is right in front of their faces because he is not who or what they want and we are witnessing how junk science is formed, promoted and sold. As serious as this is, the exact same consensus method was reached on the multi-trillion dollar Global Warming fraud.

From the media’s perspective they were expecting $2 Billion in commercials this presidential election and will receive a billion from Hillary, but from Trump likely less than $100 million spread across radio and TV. Like they say in science, follow the money.

Pray America wakes

Note: The above opinion is not necessarily my own, but FReeper Bray’s. If you wish to discuss this, please ping Bray.

[McGruff]

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 10 minutes ago

While Hillary and I both won South Carolina by big margins, Repubs got far more votes with a massive increase from past cycles.GROWING PARTY

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 20 minutes ago

The Republican Establishment has been pushing for lightweight Senator Marco Rubio to say anything to “hit” Trump.I signed the pledge-careful

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 1 hour ago

While I hear the Koch brothers are in big financial trouble (oil), word is they have chosen little Marco Rubio, the lightweight from Florida

[Seattle Conservative]

Good Morning AB and all!

If Trump has seen this, the shows ought to get real interesting this morning - especially Fox:

NY Times Bombshell Scoop: Fox News Colluded with Rubio to Give Amnesty to Illegal Aliens
Breitbart News ^ | Feb 27 2016 | Breitbart News

Posted on 2/27/2016 10:16:35 PM by MichelleWSC3
A few weeks after Senator Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 79% joined a bipartisan push for an immigration overhaul in 2013, he arrived alongside Senator Chuck Schumer at the executive dining room of News Corporation’s Manhattan headquarters for dinner.

Their mission was to persuade Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the media empire, and Roger Ailes, the chairman and chief executive of its Fox News division, to keep the network’s on-air personalities from savaging the legislation and give it a fighting chance at survival.

more here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3402846/posts

[Alas Babylon!]

This is from Rodguy911, who won’t be here today—he’s gone fishing!

So asked me to post this for him:

---

From rodguy911 | 02/28/2016 3:51:14 AM PST new

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/02/17/scalia-murdered-sealed-his-fate-4-days-before-his-death/

Obama’s climate-change plan uses the EPA to act out international agreements signed at the recent Paris summit. But in order to, yes, scam these agreements into force in the US, the EPA has to stretch and bend and distort already-existing US law. And it has done so.

However, a number of states have sued to stop the EPA, which wants to make all states cut CO2 emissions from electrical power production by 32% in the next 15 years. Aimed mainly at coal-burning plants, these regulations would create deep reductions in the overall US energy supply and output—a primary mission of the economy-wrecking Rockefeller Globalists.

The US Supreme Court, four days before Scalia’s death, with his vote, declared a narrow 5-4 halt to the Obama plan, pending a lower-court decision on the issue. The 5-4 vote didn’t knock out the plan, but it stalled it. And if Scalia had stayed alive, his vote going forward on the Obama plan could have remained crucial.

The pending TPP, another Globalist trade treaty, contains a section that allows endless changes and additions in the text as years pass. In other words, the passion for cutting energy production for the US, and the rest of the planet, can easily be expressed and ratified by the member nations.

The TPP also reveals a cynical attitude toward the “humanitarian goal of saving the planet from CO2 death.” Major corporations that burn coal and employ other ways of releasing CO2 can relocate to far-off lands (e.g., Vietnam) and spew CO2 to their hearts’ content, without messy environmental controls.
....................................
This all seems to fit. This could be the regimes MO. Its what they do! They have multiple reasons for getting rid of Scalia as they do in all their other ops. If Scalia had the goods on Roberts, which is likely, he would be looking really close at any vote Roberts made and lighting a fire under his ass every time he sided with the regime. Not to mention public outcry.

With Scalia gone they have a 5/3 court and public outcry for a few months is doable.

This wreaks of other ops like immigration, Arab spring Benghazi, IRS, so many other ops the regime does it could be real.

They may have gotten away with murdering a supreme court justice.

............

I’m still looking into all this but there are too many coincidences to think its all happening out of the blue.

Sorry I missed all the action today got to go fishing.

---

[Cboldt]

-- where's Cuban boy? --

I noticed the same thing. Seems that "flavor of the week" opposition to Trump tends to be absent from Sunday exposure. It's a choice by the candidate.

Cruz has an important race this Tuesday, so it makes sense for him to show up now.

[Alas Babylon!]

I have to respectfully disagree with this assertion:

This fall of scientific curiosity coincided with the acceptance of evolution and the elimination of creation as a state controlled belief. When evolution became settled science without any real hard evidence it became the model for all scientific theory.

The Theory of Evolution came out at the DAWN of the scientific model, and in no way coincides with the corruption of science that began shortly after World War Two.

The period of the greatest scientific advances happened in the timeframe of about 1830 thru 1950. It began with Charles Darwin himself in his voyage around the world in the ship Beagle and ended around the time of the discovery of DNA. Still, for several more decades it compelled discovery. Science is supposed to be about not believing things, but having them proved, based on evidence.

Here is a chart that DIECRTLY correlates to the advances the scientific method gave humanity:

And especially medical science. Look here:

Clean water and hygiene (science about microorganisms), new medicines, and better food production due to scientific research all led to the life expectancy we have now.

But I do agree that the POLITICIZATION of science will ruin it.

[Fishtalk]

Morning AB, All.
 
As always, thank you AB for doing this thread so reliably. Thank you Bray for your weekly wisdom and thanks yon commenters for your valued input of what YOU interpret of the Sunday political talk shows.
 
And thanks to FreeRepublic for staying around and I understand that after this fundraiser they are going to fix that goofy copy problem with all the strange characters.
 
I’m jus’ sayin’.
 
Things going kind of okay here in the swamps as we prepare for the risen Lord and the Easter season.
 
So the construction and orientation of the choir loft continues and who knew it would be so much fun?
 
In a manner of speaking.
 
I went to Stations of the Cross this past Friday because the choir director held choir practice right after this, something about the hotel he works at and scheduling. Diane Feinstein and I decided to do the Stations of the Cross because we had to go to the church any way for choir practice and what the heck, it’s Lent. Really should do stations of the cross at least once during Lent.
 
Heh.
 
SSo we did get all new choir chairs, WE ARE GETTING RISERS AS I REQUESTED IN MY EMAIL, we are also getting something to kneel on.
 
I spent half an hour, me and the rest of the choir, cutting off the wrappings of our new chairs. After climbing those choir steps I’m exhausted, and this after me and Feinstein did those Stations of the Cross where it’s nothing but genuflect, stand, kneel, stand.
 
THEN we had to actually practice singing and for a series of complicated and godawful reasons, which would make a post in and of itself, all of the male members of our choir have no one to sing with. For their weakness and the loss of the strong male voice-part of the story-sometimes they sing with the sopranos, sometimes they sing with the altos.
 
OFTEN, and this is where I come in, the altos must then….TADA…..sing the male parts.
 
Well whatever but after an hour of genuflecting, kneeling and standing, climbing those stairs from hell, spending a half an hour bending over and cutting plastic off chairs, but of course I will sing loud and deep both tenor and baritone, go to hell.
 
I totally lost my voice last night, the night of this practice. But go on, I sing deeper than those men anyway and it was kind of fun doing the baritone.
Going to mass this morning, singing in the choir loft, where I complained that the people below where the loft juts out tell me they hear ME…..which is nice but I tell Todd at least give me a soprano up there to entertain the troops.
 
Next time I go he not only moves me closer to the bannister, he puts up a big microphone in my face.
 
Whatever that’s about, we are getting the loft all wired for the speakers and hopefully it will all settle down.
 
Keep providing the commentary and I will join in upon return.
 
“Pat Fish sings the entire mass from choir loft heights,” will be the headline.
 

[John W]

Chuck Todd is on TODAY for all his new FR fans.

[McGruff]

I'm hearing this this morning and thinking it will make a great ad in the general election:

Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton argued, “we don’t need to make America great. America has never stopped being great. … Instead of building walls, we need to be tearing down barriers” in a speech after winning Saturday’s South Carolina Democratic primary.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/02/27/hillary-we-dont-need-to-america-great-instead-of-building-walls-we-need-to-be-tearing-down-barriers/

[Sacajaweau]

This Week looks delicious. Christie and Cruz aka The Pit Bull and Chihuahua. Bring Band Aids....there’s going to be blood.

[Sacajaweau]

Cuban boy needs new soles on his big boy shoes...after the pounding he took.

[Fhios]

Rubio and Cruz going safety this week without having a weekend appearance or are they giving it all to Donald Trump because the media plans on a spectacle today?

[pookie18]

I think he’s on Face The Nation

[pookie18]

I think he’s on Face The Nation

[DanZ]

-- where's Cuban boy? --

Marco is quivering in fear of being sued for Libel by a Blond Old Man with New York Values