“Because he hasn’t, there is no legislation that he’s voted on to hold over him like Cruz or Rubio.”
Most Freepers seem to realize that confiming a Supreme Court justice with a thin resume (easy to confirm, no paper trail) is not a good idea.
Why they think it would be a good idea to have a President with no paper trail is beyond me.
We’re in a new world where talk outweighs resume. It wasn’t too long ago politically where presidents all had a set of political achievements, usually governors. Also military experience. Usually decades of service. Now, it’s all media endured. It’s been happening for a couple decades. The last president with full military experience was Bush41. In each subsequent election the one with more military experience lost. Trump and Obama are succeeding because they manage the media. That’s the top requirement.
You said..
“Why they think it would be a good idea to have a President with no paper trail is beyond me.”
The division here over Trump is far worse than it was over Romney.
True. Rubio and Cruz have no executive accomplishments.
“Why they think it would be a good idea to have a President with no paper trail is beyond me.”
Because he isn’t a career(lying)politician. Trump hasn’t presented himself as either a Conservative or Liberal....he has however said what he’d do on several pressing issues hence his popularity. You can either believe him or not. Many do. Other candidates have followed his lead and gave taken his positions.