Thank you! I can't believe everyone didn't see this coming.
First, the story is "sources say" and "alleged" and blurry pictures.
Then the guy has to forcefully deny.
Then there will photographic evidence, probably of he and the woman leaving that restaurant together on 4 or 5 different days.
Which will require a bit of two-step in response by the guy. And more eyebrows will be raised in scepticism
Then, still shots of the sex tape.
The guy is therefore ruined, "not because of sex, but because he lied and can't be trusted."
The National Enquirer drags out two weeks or more in through-the-roof sales on this story, and the guy is twisting in the wind... waiting for the next high heeled shoe to drop.
Once it is all over, the Capitol Hill staffers and non-scooping reporters talk about how they knew it all along.
Yea. NE sells mags. So they need a slow moving story. Its their M.O. And, you can be sure that NE’s lawyers were crawling all over this story like ants on a lollipop. No way they would drop it without back up.