[catnipman]

I’m a major Trump supporter, but I don’t cotton to this kind of innuendo. If there’s actual evidence, then fine, it could be a legitimate issue, but only because Cruz operatives attacked Melania Trump and because Cruz presents himself as wholesome as apple pie and “holier than thou”. Otherwise, I generally could give a rat’s behind about who sleeps with who because don’t necessarily think it’s particularly relevant. After all, Ronald Reagan was MAJOR womanizer even while married to Jane Wyman and to some degree when he was first married to Nancy Davis.

But right now, I’ve seen no EVIDENCE about these putative Cruz peccadilloes, just a bunch of BS innuendo. And I don’t necessarily assume there’s fire just because there’s smoke because the enemedia is REALLY good a blowing smoke up peoples’ behinds.

[grania]

It's a legitimate issue if it affects how people perceive a candidate and how folks vote. If you read through the threads, what most people are having trouble with are responses: The delayed and not outraged enough condemnation of the photo of Melania on the eve of Utah's primary. The lack of an immediate and unequivocal denial of marital infidelity. Instead Cruz blamed Trump for the story. Putting Neil Bush on his campaign staff.

Why doesn't Cruz just come out and say he was NEVER unfaithful to Heidi?