Posted on 03/28/2016 4:58:25 PM PDT by drewh
Trump charged about Cruz:
He’s the one that started it. From what I hear, he and his campaign went out and bought the cover shoot. Melania did a cover shoot for GQ, a very strong modeling picture. No big deal. But it was a cover shoot for GQ, a big magazine. And it was, you know, fine and, if from what I hear, he was the one, or his campaign bought the rights and give it to the super PAC. That super PAC is friendly to Ted Cruz. He started it. I didn’t.
Trump was also questioned about a retweet of an unflattering picture of Heidi Cruz next to Melania, which Trump posted after blasting Cruz for the ad against Melania.
Well, it was a retweet somebody sent to me. It was a retweet. Look, what he did was far worse. He takes out a thing and sends it to Utah, the voters of Utah. It was a cover shoot. It was, by a big magazine. She was a very, very successful model. Big model. Did lots of shoots, cover shoots. To send it like it was a bad picture was disgusting to me. They make me like the bad guy here. I’m just responding to what he does. I respond. I counter punch. I’m responding to what he does. The press likes to make me the bad guy.
Trump then repeated the allegation that Cruz bought the rights to the G.Q. photo, saying, “He’s the one that started it. He knew about the picture. He may have even bought the rights to the picture, meaning his campaign. The super PAC had it. He’s close to the super PAC. I didn’t start this. He did.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Evidence?
“From what I hear...”
There was absolutely no reason for Cruz to run the Melania ad in Utah.
Someone bought it or ummmm....'borrowed' it.
Except to create a feud with Trump to creat obfuscation because the affair rumors were about to be published.
Interesting verbiage.
How do you solve a problem like Heidi?
How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?
That implies coordination between Cruz and the anti-Trump PAC and would be illegal. Evidence?
Except of course to deflect Rubio’s floozy story at trump.
The North American Union advocates on this forum don’t care who bought the rights to the GQ photo shoot.
They want their north American Union.
That means getting rid of Trump.
If Melania was 16 when that shot was taken, does that make Cruz/campaign/PAC guilty of possessing and distributing child pornography?
If Melania was 16 when that shot was taken, does that make Cruz/campaign/PAC guilty of possessing and distributing child pornography?
“That implies coordination between Cruz and the anti-Trump PAC and would be illegal. Evidence?”
Yes - we’re talking Cruz. If he WASN’T coordinating, that would be news.
LOL!!! Good one!
Any evidence or are you speculating?
She wasn’t sixteen - it was taken sixteen years ago.
They don't need any "evidence" to follow Trump down the rabbit hole.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.