Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Durbin

Uhm considering Jeff Roe purchase the rights to the photograph used, the advertisement could only have been made with his knowledge and consent.


6 posted on 03/31/2016 5:56:33 AM PDT by PJBankard (Donald Trump is the Honey Badger of Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: PJBankard

So you’re accusing Cruz of breaking federal law?


10 posted on 03/31/2016 5:58:59 AM PDT by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PJBankard

There is no proof Roe purchased the rights to the photo. That shouldn’t be too hard to prove.


11 posted on 03/31/2016 6:01:24 AM PDT by mouse1 (Je Suis Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PJBankard

“Uhm considering Jeff Roe purchase the rights to the photograph used, the advertisement could only have been made with his knowledge and consent.”

According to information in a published article, no such purchase took place, and no such purchase could have happened. GQ did not own the rights to the photograph, so GQ was not capable of licensing the photograph to Roe, the SuprePac, or to anyone else. The owner is reported to be the photographer, Antoine Verglas; and he is complaining the photograph has been used by the SuperPac without his permission and in violation of his copyright on that photograph.


18 posted on 03/31/2016 6:17:42 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson