Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU 'too clunky to copy German anti-terror model'
TheLocal.de ^ | 04 Apr 2016 10:36 GMT+02:00 | (DPA/The Local)

Posted on 04/04/2016 7:33:25 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Trying to bring all of Europe’s security forces under one roof to fight terrorism would be more trouble than it’s worth, Germany’s Interior Minister said on Sunday.

“A European counter-terror center would have to bring together 28 states with innumerable authorities… transferring the German model to Europe would hardly work,” (Thomas) de Maizière told Tagesspiegel am Sonntag.

Germany’s Public Prosecutor General Peter Frank and the German Police Union (DPolG) had previously called for the EU to copy Germany’s joint terror defense center after it emerged that European countries had not shared intelligence that could have helped stop attacks in Brussels and Paris. […]

“That would mean changing the European treaties,” he (de Mazière) explained. “Such a change costs time… we would slip into a discussion about details that would cause us to neglect cooperation and fighting terrorism.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at thelocal.de ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Germany; Syria; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: brussels; euarmy; eurabia; eussr; hijrah; isis; paris; rop

1 posted on 04/04/2016 7:33:25 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Not to worry.

Once the German “anti-terror” model succeeds in importing millions of Muslims, the EU will soon be replaced by the Caliphate.


2 posted on 04/04/2016 7:36:03 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Germany has an anti-terror model?

All we've seen thus far is official suppression of German citizens opposed to importation of more head choppers.

3 posted on 04/04/2016 7:38:18 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Someone in Europe should create an International Criminal Police Organization to fight international crime and international terrorism. They could give it a catchy name . . . like Interpol. I'll even give them a logo they can use:


4 posted on 04/04/2016 7:42:36 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

They do already have “Europol”.

And do you recall Interpol’s roots in Austria, and the NSDAP’s takeover of that organization in the Anschluss?


5 posted on 04/04/2016 8:14:01 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“That would mean changing the European treaties,” he (de Mazière) explained. “Such a change costs time… we would slip into a discussion about details that would cause us to neglect cooperation and fighting terrorism.”

Well, that’s why the terrorists will run circles around your bloated bureaucracy.


6 posted on 04/04/2016 8:17:01 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Any EU-wide anti-terror model, will only be used against “Islamophobes”, “radical right wingers”, and critics of the Establishment.

That is its real purpose.


7 posted on 04/04/2016 8:26:42 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

There is something in the Treaty of Lisbon called “enhanced cooperation”, though, which does not entail all 28 countries centralizing their anti-terror efforts, but “at least nine member states”; it also encompasses the notion of a unified military among such a smaller group of nations. Don’t be surprised if such a thing progresses, especially in post-Merkel days.


8 posted on 04/04/2016 8:29:17 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Certainly the purpose of the admitted internationalist left. The voice of the less internationalist left is getting louder though.


9 posted on 04/04/2016 8:30:36 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I may have been aware of that.

NSDAP = Nazi? As in National Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei? It’s a good thing that socialist worker’s parties have nothing in common with that horrendous source of evil (just ask any liberal). After eight years of Obama, who says the differences between capitalism and communism, between freedom and totalitarianism do not matter, socialist is actually cool with today’s young people. What could go wrong?


10 posted on 04/04/2016 9:04:35 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

To paraphrase both Alice in Wonderland and several Soviet propagandists, “gloriouser and gloriouser”.


11 posted on 04/04/2016 9:07:00 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


12 posted on 04/04/2016 9:54:37 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson