Posted on 04/13/2016 9:25:46 AM PDT by reaganaut1
Crime: The Obama administration has just made it easier for felons to move in next door. Landlords who don’t want tenants who are going to mug their neighbors or deal drugs will now be treated as racists and potentially sued.
Last week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development issued new guidelines to landlords, warning that bans against renters with criminal convictions violate the Fair Housing Act because they disproportionately affect minorities.
In effect, the Obama regime is now outlawing criminal background checks for apartment rentals, even though such screening is critical for the protection and security of tenants and property, and serves a legitimate business need.
In a newly released 10-page missive, HUD warns landlords they can be held liable for discrimination if they deny housing over criminal records.
“HUD will use the full force of the law to protect the fair housing rights of folks who’ve been arrested or who’re returning to their communities after serving time in jail or prison,” HUD Secretary Julian Castro warned.
By “full force,” he means the “disparate impact” theory of civil-rights enforcement, which HUD claims is written into the Fair Housing Act even though the phrase appears nowhere in the statute.
Disparate impact holds businesses liable for colorblind policies and practices that may have adverse outcomes for minorities — in this case, screening all apartment applicants for criminal histories. It doesn’t matter if there is zero intent to discriminate in carrying out such polices. The policies will be condemned as racist regardless.
“The ‘disparate impact’ standard is one of the most powerful tools we have to stamp out discrimination,” Castro said. “And I want you to know that HUD will not be shy about using it.”
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
Total breakdown of the system. It seems crime does pay. What really is going on is what the Muslim stated when he got elected Fundamentally change America! This is what it is.
What's unbelievable is when a landlord is sued for a renter (previous criminal) attacks another renter and the landlord tries to use the defense of the Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines. Guess the judge will take say 30 seconds to rule on that defense and award damages to the renter.
Good point.
Yes, all part of his plan. And his approval ratings continue to get better.
So much for the concept of private property, tovarishchi. I’m afraid we’re going to have to round the leftists up and keep them in cages if national tragedy is to be averted.
That’s why the inherent right to keep and bear arms is the hill to die on. Give that up and you’re nothing more than another man’s property.
Don’t even need to go that far. Just remove a single knob from the stove and the aparment will fail a compliance inspection :)
Everything from this monster is about punishing white people and succesful American citizens.
The problem is, it doesn’t matter why you deny them, if they can show that any criteria you use has a “disparate impact”, they’ll say that criteria is forbidden.
The safest way is simply not to tell prospective tenants why they were denied. Of course, you will lose rentals that way, since many people could requalify if they got a cosigner. However, there would be no evidence for the government to pursue you in these kinds of lawsuits, because there would be no record of the criteria you are using.
He does, but had to move for a job and tried to rent an apartment when they first got there until they could find a house. He had owned his own house for so long and didn’t need to rent, and they were shocked to find out that apartments would not rent to a felon for 100 years.
Banks don’t like to give ex-felons loans too much either...
What about those that are on predator lists? Domestic violence orders? Drug dealers?
How about laws which have landlord liability FOR renting to felons committing crimes?
There is no way this will sustain b/c it is way too vaugue.
Well, it’s not that we are too lazy necessarily, it’s that we are too content. People don’t join a revolution when their bellies are full, they have air conditioning, cable tv and smart phones. Those people have too much to lose by revolting.
That’s why communism could never succeed in America with the standard game plan that worked in most of the rest of the world. It’s also why we aren’t going to revolt to restore the Constitution, at least not until things get a LOT worse.
You should request a fee for checking the credit of each person and then go do it.
You can’t be sued for that.
This law is obviously needed because as it stands, no felons rent apartments, anywhere.
Let Obama take them into his new home after HJan 21m 2017/ He has 2 nice ripe daughters. Let him get a taste of his own medicine.
Let’s do away with HUD, ok.
bkmk
Al,I know is if the govt is tracking these people out of jail , like probation,or other terms of release like sex offenders, then regular citizens can too.
If they are barred from certain jobs due to felonies then that info is germaine to landlords.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.