Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan; rwoodward; sheik yerbouty; HiTech RedNeck; chajin; cincinnati65; Ted Grant

If I remember correctly an eye for an eye was intended as a statement of restraint, because the then acceptable response was to decimate the entire tribe of the offender.


67 posted on 04/14/2016 1:43:41 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Retain Mike

Yes, it’s a loosening of the prior moral standard.


74 posted on 04/14/2016 3:26:01 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson