Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"while he doesn’t believe there will be an indictment, “I think there are going to be some leaks that are going to be very damaging to Hillary Clinton. Look, what she did was an act of recklessness, and entitlement, that there’s no excuse for. And she’s going to have to go up to the FBI, under oath, and explain why she did this."

Hillary Clinton will soon be required to testify under oath about all the activities she has been involved with.

She has already testified under oath before Congress and clearly perjured herself.

Bernstein is a MSM leftist. He does not think Hillary Clinton will be indicted. Clinton should be indicted but thee system is so corrupt that nothing is certain.

But even a leftist like Bernstein realizes how dishonest and unpopular Hillary Clinton is.

1 posted on 05/04/2016 9:57:16 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: detective

“..the usual, fact-based media...”

I am lost...


2 posted on 05/04/2016 9:59:20 AM PDT by Zarro (Ted Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I know, for a long time, I have been in the Biden/Warren camp when replacing Hillary! for any number of reasons. But I am now wondering about Biden’s age. Does anyone think it will make a difference that he’s already 73? I mean, I KNOW Big Media won’t make it an issue like they did with Reagan. But the masses may think twice about it. What other older ‘star’do you think might they replace Hillary! with?


3 posted on 05/04/2016 10:01:36 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Leftist drunk Bernstein trying to be relevant : )


4 posted on 05/04/2016 10:02:03 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I am still praying, that the FBI will recommend for indictment.

She abjectly violated the law and she put this nation’s security at risk by having and sending classified data through her personal email server in violation of the law.

If you or I had done the same, we would already have been indicted, tried, and sent up the river.


6 posted on 05/04/2016 10:05:19 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

You betcha! If the FBI doesn’t get at least an indictment the leaks are going to be YUGE.


8 posted on 05/04/2016 10:06:06 AM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at its finest, and we are financing it. It may prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history. This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money and repackage it for your own purposes. All tax free. Read on.

Fox/s Krauthammer said some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.

Here's a concise summary the Clinton Foundation's tax free international money laundering scheme:

1. First, create a separate foreign “charity.”.......this one's in Canada.

2. Foreign oligarchs and governments then donate to this Canadian charity......over 1,000 ontributed mega millions out of the goodness of their hearts expecting nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then bundles the separate mega-donations and makes one massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. (Canadian officials dispute the claim)

5. The Clinton Foundation then “spends” some of this money for legitimate good works programs (observers believe not more than a measly 10%). The rest goes to enrich the Clinton’s, for salaries paid to untold numbers of political factotums, hangers on, and to fund the Clintons' lavish lifestyle, travel, etc...... all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.

6. The billion dollar Clinton Foundation can hire the world’s best accountants but somehow fails to report much of this funding on their tax filings. They allude to them as“clerical errors” and announce they are they are-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Include as a principal mining investor Frank Giustra, Clinton/s globe-trotting crony, who is central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia.

Net result — foreign money goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and is untraceable to the original donor.

This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Now you know why Hillary’s destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.

The Clintons could be back in the White House in January, 2017 unless people are informed. So inform and educate them.

9 posted on 05/04/2016 10:06:48 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

“He does not think Hillary Clinton will be indicted. Clinton should be indicted but thee system is so corrupt that nothing is certain. “

Let me expand on this. I have been investigating Harry Reid for 7 years with inside sources. He is so corrupt and mobbed up it makes my head spin. There is hope that he will be indicted in coming months, but the evidence is so blatant and the stonewalling by even Republicans is so great that I despair for our countries future.

And that’s before we even get to Hillary.


11 posted on 05/04/2016 10:11:48 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (wrote Harry Reid.s only biography www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
There is no question that Hillary broke the law. And if they can indict General Pertraus for disclosing his itinerary, then if the law was fair they should indict Hillary Clinton. Bernstein, Geraldo Riveria, and others either do not know government security laws or are simply spewing misinformation.

News (even Fox News) has cease to be a look at the facts and more about spreading propaganda.

19 posted on 05/04/2016 10:26:56 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Hillary just got beat by Bernie.....again.

Hillary is destroying the Democrat Party.

The Democrat leaders are calling the FBI and begging them to pick up Hillary.

This is the best year I’ve had since I was a kid!


21 posted on 05/04/2016 10:30:10 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
I will believe it when I see it. The whole government is so in the tank for Mrs. Bill thatI don't believe anyone is left that has the cojones to leak or to resign.
23 posted on 05/04/2016 10:38:33 AM PDT by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali soIg o feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

If Bernstein and Bob Woodward weren’t Democrat partisans, they would be doing the same number on the Clinton’s that they did on Nixon. Bill, Hilly, and Obama would all be on their way to jail.
But they are partisan Democrats, so the best we are going to get is an occasional hint that they know plenty and others are going to leak that information.
Cowards.


24 posted on 05/04/2016 10:40:51 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Has-been. The leaks started in the late eighties when she was a lowly tail coat hanger on philandering governors wife.

Bernstein, as great presidential investigative reporter, allowed this monstrosity to reign for lo these many years in failing his responsibility,

He needs to go away like rush does


28 posted on 05/04/2016 10:53:54 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Bullshit. She just got away with telling coal miners that she never said she would close-down their mines a week after promising to close-down their mines. She can get away with ANYTHING.


30 posted on 05/04/2016 11:04:39 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
Bernstein began by stating that in the general election “all bets are off,” including the usual GOP-Dem breakdown as an important factor, celebrity might be more important than ideology, and “TMZ, Drudge, new media, [are] going to have a huge role in this, much more than the usual, fact-based media.”

Umm, yeah ... It was Drudge that broke the Clinton scandals years ago. Not because Drudge GOT it first but because papers like the Washington Post chose to sit on the story in deference to Democrats.

Bias has a price - and the 'price' became the power of Drudge.

31 posted on 05/04/2016 11:05:06 AM PDT by GOPJ (Imagine the shrieking MSM outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car... David French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

When? After the Feeble Bureau of Investgation finishes their work in 2025, the day after Hillary’s second term ends?


32 posted on 05/04/2016 11:05:34 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Is Bernstein REALLY saying the Post will sit on the Clinton leaks ONE MORE TIME?


33 posted on 05/04/2016 11:05:53 AM PDT by GOPJ (Imagine the shrieking MSM outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car... David French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I have no confidence is any part of the federal government to do what is right, in any situation. I do not believe that the FBI will do anything overt or covert to rock the boat for the rats. They are a go along, get along organization.


35 posted on 05/04/2016 11:13:19 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Even if she’s not indicted I suspect some of her co-conspirators will be. And that will raise the question Why?


37 posted on 05/04/2016 12:02:49 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
"Don’t you think the senate would love to be rid of him?"

That must be the best case scenario. Execution is probably about halfway down from there.
43 posted on 05/04/2016 4:05:33 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson