To: NRx
All that submarine has to do is surface under the Spanish boat, problem solved.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
3 posted on
05/05/2016 6:09:39 AM PDT by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The sub was probably already fully surfaced passing through there. The Spanish boat should know better - bouncing off a very think steel submarine hull could be unpleasant. The sub also almost certainly has legal right of way in a restricted channel, since they cannot maneuver.
6 posted on
05/05/2016 6:16:29 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I’ve seen those subs. THEY ARE HUGE............................
12 posted on
05/05/2016 6:24:59 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
No one expects the SPANISH INCURSION!!
27 posted on
05/05/2016 6:58:22 AM PDT by
PeteePie
(Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
“All that submarine has to do is surface under the Spanish boat, problem solved.”
Probably not worth the damage. I saw the Greenville after it did that.
32 posted on
05/05/2016 7:26:35 AM PDT by
CrazyIvan
(Socialists are just communists in their larval stage.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Yeah, porpoise pop the sucker.
40 posted on
05/05/2016 8:40:59 AM PDT by
GingisK
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Yea, and skipper gets courts martialed for dinging a billion dollar US Naval asset and endangering his crew.
I understand the sentiment, but please.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson