Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why a conservative economist says Trump could make America ‘the North Korea of economics’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/06/how-trump-could-make-america-the-north-korea-of-economics/ ^ | May 6 , 2016 | Jim Tankersley

Posted on 05/08/2016 5:49:19 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: Pearls Before Swine
The benefits of protectionism:
  1. repatriation of industry
  2. general increase in economic activity
  3. decreasing or no trade deficits
  4. balanced Federal budgets
  5. higher levels of baseline employment
  6. less social stress
  7. less political will for socialism
  8. increased national security
  9. raising interest rate will not crater the economy.

21 posted on 05/08/2016 6:13:05 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

America will never be destroyed when guided by its spirit of personal responsibility and independence. This is precisely why these pundits insist we follow rules and regulations intended to destroy us. Playing by rules designed to force one side to lose is a loser’s game.


22 posted on 05/08/2016 6:13:30 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Stop Islam and save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Economists and weathermen are a couple of folks that get paid to be wrong most of the time!


23 posted on 05/08/2016 6:13:38 AM PDT by RayofHope (I want to be sick of winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
When it comes to trade policy in particular there isn't a dimes worth of difference between George Washington, Trump and Bernie Sanders. That fact is conveniently overlooked here on FR.

Fixed it. No charge buck wheat.

24 posted on 05/08/2016 6:14:23 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Totally agree.


25 posted on 05/08/2016 6:14:41 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: impimp
terrible when it comes to free trade

Or at least giving some that impression. Watch and learn grasshopper how it all plays out. This is all pert of his strategy, and it attacks several different fronts at the same time. Talk is always cheap as my dad used to say, and actions always speak louder.

26 posted on 05/08/2016 6:15:15 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wow!!! O. K. I will go out and vote for Hillary. A-hole!!


27 posted on 05/08/2016 6:19:19 AM PDT by ZULU (DON'T GO OFF THE RESERVATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I agree, for the most part.

Don’t worry, I’m voting for Donald, not Mitt (haha).


28 posted on 05/08/2016 6:21:37 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (The would-be Empress has no clothes. My eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Agreed.

"Don't expect much sympathy for that view here on FR."

I don't. Many here like the protectionist approach, which sounds good but, unfortunately, history shows it does not result in "America first" in the long run.

But Trump is making political hay out of this issue. I hope he'll reconsider his tactics when he gets in office.

Regardless - go Trump!

29 posted on 05/08/2016 6:24:56 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

In this case, the naysayers are right. If Trump tried to pull off half of what he threatens to do, such as repudiating national debt (which is unconstitutional until five economic illiterates and legal ciphers on the SCOTUS say it isn’t) or unilaterally abrogating treaty obligations, it will be an economic, diplomatic, humanitarian, and security catastrophe. The only reason I’d ever vote for Trump is because I believe he cannot fulfill his promises, while Hillary Clinton will do worse than she has promised, with full connivance from Congress and Scotus.


30 posted on 05/08/2016 6:26:46 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full Civil Rights for Necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

You’d better figure out that jobs in America produces money in the pockets of Americans that is spent in America putting more money in the pockets of Americans that they can spend on American goods which causes more Americans to be working instead of on the public dole and our economy takes an upswing as a result. A rising tide floats all boats. Problem is America’s big lake has been drained by foreigners. Time to fill up our own Lake instead of China’s. When competition comes back into play when we are manufacturing our needs instead of paying for things ten times over because they are five cents cheaper, we’ll start to recognize the money saved by quality production. Americans have been sold a bill of goods to buy cheap instead of to buy wisely. Free Trade is free for everyone but us. I don’t like rules that cripple the US Economy which is NO LONGER the number one in the World. WISE UP!


31 posted on 05/08/2016 6:27:43 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: central_va
...
George Washington, Trump and Bernie Sanders ...

LOL. You may be right about that.

But I'm sticking with Rothbard, von Mises and Friedman for my economic advice. George was a good guy but somehow I don't recall that he was an expert on international trade.

And I take it that you don't disagree with me on the Trump/Bernie alignment on trade and tariffs. If not you might point out the key differences.

32 posted on 05/08/2016 6:28:48 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: impimp; All

There is no such thing as “free trade”.

It’s managed trade through rigged treaties. .

The United States from 1945 to 1996 was a world Super Power. That’s not even debated. We led the world in a lot of categories took. At the time we did not have NAFTA, GATT, etc.... How do you explain that?

The current rigged trade deals have been put in by the Globalsit to weaken the Unites States and THAT is what it has done. The United States was a stronger country from 1945 to 1996 than it is from NAFTA going forward.

The current trade agreements are RIGGED AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

1) WE PAY TARRIFFS 20 to 40% and they (China and Mexico) pay nothing. THow is that fair and not rigged???

2). When aour exports increase, then China is allowed to manipulate their currency. So that it’s even harder for us to export. How is that fair?

3). Our industry has massive regulations, but China does not have to follow the same regulations. Hence, it encourages good jobs to leave the United States and open up in China with dirty coal plants, factories, etc... Plus they can export for free version having a factory in the U.S. where they have to pay TARRIFFS to China and Mexico.

4). Many of theses jobs in China are paid at slave labor wages. Ten cents an hour like at Foxcon for Apple. There is no way a U.S worker can work for 10 cents an hour over here. That’s not enough to pay your electric bill.

5). The only jobs tag at are coming in are minimum wage jobs that used to be called summer jobs when I was a kid. We are watching the United States being de-industrialized and weakened.

If you goal is to weaken the United States then you should be all for the RIGED TRADE DEALS. However, if you are for a strong United States, then let’s get the United State back to when we were a Super Power before NAFTA from 1945 to 1996.


33 posted on 05/08/2016 6:29:35 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

MV=PY

LOL. The Equation of Exchange. I should have known.
34 posted on 05/08/2016 6:30:22 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Why doesn’t Scotland make wine from domestically grown grapes, then? Why not only drink American grown coffee? And only buy American made clothing, because so many young American girls have had their dreams of growing up to be seamstresses toiling in a sweatshop dashed by unfair foreign competition?


35 posted on 05/08/2016 6:31:29 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full Civil Rights for Necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Agreed. That is why the Nanny State is pushed so hard so people will lose personal independence and responsibility. “It takes a village” mentality has been sold to the younger generations for far too long. Time to rejuvenate our “Frontier Spirit” here in the U.S.A.


36 posted on 05/08/2016 6:31:42 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Stopped reading at the stupid “Immigrants from Mexico” crap.

More like invaders.


37 posted on 05/08/2016 6:33:18 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The GOPe must be defeated.....the sooner the better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
WISE UP!

LOL. We should all follow that advice.

You give the classic argument in favor of tariffs. History does not support that argument. The rising tide benefits those companies and industries that become more competitive when tariffs are introduced. The Federal Government benefits due to the new source of tax revenue.

Everyone else is a loser in both the short run and the long run. You can argue otherwise but you can't prove it by any means that I'm aware of. If you can then do so. Simply restating the Sanders/Trump view is not good enough for me.

38 posted on 05/08/2016 6:34:22 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Free Traitors


39 posted on 05/08/2016 6:35:35 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: impimp

Free trade is great for attaining Marxist internationalist goals, but not much else.


40 posted on 05/08/2016 6:36:32 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson