Heck, if you can get away with paying women less than men, then why are companies not chocked full of women? It’s logical, after all, since personnel costs are huge and hiring only women that can do the same job means more profit. . .
Good point. If there were really such rampant discrimination, companies would not hire men at all. They would hire only women, and enjoy the 30+% discount on wages and salaries.
But this doesn’t happen.
I had to laugh at the recent report, which showed that women management personnel at the Clinton foundation were paid over 30% less than the men doing similar jobs.
It’s logical, after all,
please try not to confuse the little dears with logic...