Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State staffers who raised concerns about Clinton’s email were told never to mention it again
/hotair ^ | MAY 25, 2016 | JOHN SEXTON

Posted on 05/26/2016 11:54:19 AM PDT by MarvinStinson

A State Department Information Resource Management staffer who raised concerns about Secretary Clinton’s email arrangement was told, falsely, that the system had been approved by Department legal staff. That staffer, and another staffer who raised similar concerns, was also told never to mention it again.

Politico reports:

“In one meeting, one staff member raised concerns that information sent and received on Secretary Clinton’s account could contain Federal records that needed to be preserved in order to satisfy Federal recordkeeping requirements,” the report noted.

The staff member recalled that the director said Clinton’s personal system had already been reviewed and approved by legal staff “and that the matter was not to be discussed any further,” according to the report’s language.

“As previously noted, OIG found no evidence that staff in the Office of the Legal Adviser reviewed or approved Secretary Clinton’s personal system,” the next line of the report reads.

The other staff member who raised concerns said the director stated that the department’s mission is to “support the Secretary and instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.” Not only was Clinton’s email arrangement not approved by anyone at the State Department, the IG report makes clear that, had she bothered to ask, she would have been told not to do it. Obviously she anticipated that response which is why she didn’t ask permission in the first place.

Now we learn that even when the issue was raised as a concern by staff tasked with Information Resource Management, Clinton’s palace guard within the State Department 1) lied through their teeth and 2) told them to shut up. Not just shut up but never speak of it again. In a sane world the staffers who raised those concerns would be getting a pat on the back and an apology and the supervisor who lied and tried to silence them would be out of a job. But this is the Obama State Department don’t count on any sort of rational, non-political reaction to official misbehavior.

Earlier today I covered some of the other highlights of the State Department Inspector General’s report on Clinton’s email system. The IG concluded several things which are at odds with statements Clinton has made about the arrangement starting last year. He concluded she violated record-keeping rules which required her to turn over official records before vacating her post and said the records she did eventually turn over to the Department were incomplete. The IG report also revealed that Hillary and most of her aides refused to cooperate with his investigation and that at least two attempts were made to hack into her server. The full report will be published on the IG’s website Thursday.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails; statedeptig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: rfreedom4u

Yes. And it’s too bad that some retirement ready State official didn’t formalize the inquiry with an email cc’d to about 25 people including the CIO, chief security officer, chief counsel, IG and the senior career deputies of each of the above. Followed by a full download with whomever handles whistleblower protection at State.


21 posted on 05/26/2016 12:27:07 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Special Prosecutor.


22 posted on 05/26/2016 12:37:19 PM PDT by Jenny217
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Criminal government run by criminals with their criminal minions. Disgusting.


23 posted on 05/26/2016 12:43:23 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

HOW MANY people who investigated the Kennedy assassination or were involved in it died prematurely?


24 posted on 05/26/2016 12:44:32 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Doesn’t amaze me.
After all, they HAVE gotten away with whatever they want...


25 posted on 05/26/2016 12:49:14 PM PDT by Little Ray (NOTHING THAT SOMEONE ELSE HAS TO PAY FOR IS A RIGHT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
Bernie told the press not to ask questions about the eamils in the first debate - then the press took it off off the table. They obeyed...

I mean if Trump was under investigation by the FBI I'm sure the press would have dropped ALL questions about corrupted emails if Cruz had said he wasn't interested in any damn emails... Chuck Todd would say, “yes sir - it's off the table’.../s Same with the New York Times...

26 posted on 05/26/2016 12:50:54 PM PDT by GOPJ (Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

The press reports I’ve read say the IG position was vacant during her time at state. Not good for government accountability..


27 posted on 05/26/2016 2:13:01 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
The staff member recalled that the director said

Who is the director?

28 posted on 05/26/2016 2:23:36 PM PDT by usurper (Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

I’m surprised they’re still alive.


29 posted on 05/26/2016 2:44:22 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

That’s something I would have done. I don’t like being told to ‘sit down and shut up’.


30 posted on 05/26/2016 3:28:12 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson