Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept. objects to judge’s order for ethics classes, disclosure of immigrant data
The Washington Times ^ | May 31, 2016 | Andrea Noble

Posted on 05/31/2016 10:14:00 AM PDT by jazusamo

The Justice Department fired back at the Texas judge who ordered its attorneys to undertake ethics classes after finding they misled the court in a high-profile challenge to President Obama’s deportation amnesty — saying the order was beyond the judge’s authority and would cost millions to implement.

In a motion filed Tuesday asking for a stay of the order, in which U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen said DOJ attorneys were “intentionally deceptive,” government attorneys outlined their objections to both the training requirements and his requirement that by June 10 the Department of Homeland Security turn over identifying information for 50,000 immigrants who entered the United States illegally and are now participants in a government program that shields them from deportation.

“The sanctions ordered by the Court far exceed the bounds of appropriate remedies for what this Court concluded were intentional misrepresentations, a conclusion that was reached without proper procedural protections and that lacks sufficient evidentiary support,” DOJ attorneys wrote their motion for the stay.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: andrewhanen; coverup; doj; judgehanen; justicedepartment; justus; lyinglawyers; sanctions; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
These poor babies at DOJ should have learned as kids there are consequences for lying.
1 posted on 05/31/2016 10:14:00 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

ok instead, put them in jail for contempt of court..


2 posted on 05/31/2016 10:15:44 AM PDT by rolling_stone (1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Exactly what they deserve.


3 posted on 05/31/2016 10:17:56 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The DOJ cares about $? Put the miscreants in the Fed Pen for 5 yr after disbarring them.


4 posted on 05/31/2016 10:18:37 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Live Free or Die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Let’s hope the Judge takes them at their word on this motion, Yes I may have overstepped my authority issuing that order, it is rescinded.

I hereby find you in Contempt and sentence you to 120 days in Jail and a $100,000 Fine. Remanded in to Custody. Bailiff take him away.

Do this to EVERY DOJ Lawyer that walks in.


5 posted on 05/31/2016 10:19:16 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Suddenly, they’re concerned about their budget? They’ve probably blown untold millions on all kinds of frivolous perks, but now they’re frugal? Hilarious! Jail them!


6 posted on 05/31/2016 10:19:46 AM PDT by Zarro (This tagline space available for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Find the money for these ethics classes by fining the lying lawyers to pay for it. Problem solved.


7 posted on 05/31/2016 10:21:29 AM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Obama’s Justice Dept. objects to ethics.


8 posted on 05/31/2016 10:21:33 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“The sanctions ordered by the Court far exceed the bounds of appropriate remedies for what this Court concluded were intentional misrepresentations, a conclusion that was reached without proper procedural protections and that lacks sufficient evidentiary support,” DOJ attorneys wrote their motion for the stay.

Did these slimeballs even read that judge's reasoning -- because there was pleanty of evidentiary support; in fact, given the conspiracy uncovered to lie to the court [repeatedly] it stands to reason that a criminal investigation into the matter ought to be held.

9 posted on 05/31/2016 10:22:19 AM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“Justice Dept. objects to judge’s order for ethics classes, disclosure of immigrant data”

I don't think ethics classes will work for these liars.

Disbarment would be a better approach. Perhaps hefty fines as well.

But at least the time spent fighting over having to attend ethics classes is time that can't be spent pursuing Obama’s agenda.

10 posted on 05/31/2016 10:22:32 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ethics? We don’t need no steenkin’ ethics.


11 posted on 05/31/2016 10:22:54 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Why isn't Hillary in jail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
I hereby find you in Contempt and sentence you to 120 days in Jail and a $100,000 Fine. Remanded in to Custody. Bailiff take him away.

Do this to EVERY DOJ Lawyer that walks in.

LOL -- I like this.

12 posted on 05/31/2016 10:23:34 AM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think it is actually far more simple: the DOJ and Homeland have approved more applications, and in making the response to the judge’s order, they would actually have to admit that once again they lied to the court.

So now they squabble over the judge’s order, in hopes that this instead becomes the focus.


13 posted on 05/31/2016 10:24:11 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think it is actually far more simple: the DOJ and Homeland have approved more applications, and in making the response to the judge’s order, they would actually have to admit that once again they lied to the court.

So now they squabble over the judge’s order, in hopes that this instead becomes the focus.


14 posted on 05/31/2016 10:24:11 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

F-4U

Please click pic to donate or become a MONTHLY DONOR

15 posted on 05/31/2016 10:24:13 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Courts (except the Supreme) exist by Congress,
and the DOJ is funded by the House.

The EXEMPT, and always eagerly complicit, GOP
has supported Fast&Furious and the IRS coverup.
Every murder. Every rape. Every Quartering of incurable
disease. And there were scores TODAY.

Kabuki, true. But at the end of every day,
the GOP is on its back, eagerly COMPLICIT.


16 posted on 05/31/2016 10:25:28 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nothing will happen to a Democrat DOJ. Rats are exempt and immune.


17 posted on 05/31/2016 10:26:23 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Yep, disbarment and fines are appropriate in my view.

These turkeys got caught red handed in a conspiracy to lie and did lie to a federal judge, they should never again be allowed to practice law in this country.


18 posted on 05/31/2016 10:28:22 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Would cost millions to implement?? They’re costing us billions to keep them here.


19 posted on 05/31/2016 10:32:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Judge has the power to have them brought up for disbarrment. Every single one involved. Do it Judge Hanen. Then they have no ethics class to fret about. That includes every person on the paperwork and letterhead. They are responsible. Good way to get rid of Loretta Lynch.


20 posted on 05/31/2016 10:32:20 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson