Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept. objects to judge’s order for ethics classes, disclosure of immigrant data
The Washington Times ^ | May 31, 2016 | Andrea Noble

Posted on 05/31/2016 10:14:00 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Sacajaweau; ExTexasRedhead

“The DOJ estimates the costs to send more than 3,000 attorneys to ethics classes could total between $5 million to $8 million over five years.”

NOw here’s the real problem. the DOJ “has more than 3,000 attorneys!” Time for a serious RIF!


41 posted on 05/31/2016 10:55:20 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
ok instead, put them in jail for contempt of court

and revoke their law licenses. DC corruption is in dire need of legal consequence and a judge's scolding won't cut it.

42 posted on 05/31/2016 10:55:35 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - once a liar, always a liar. The attorneys took a gamble and lost, and their careers in law should be in jeopardy. And that qualifies them for the Mexifornia judiciary. So don’t feel bad for them.


43 posted on 05/31/2016 10:59:43 AM PDT by RideForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

I’d rather it be for perjury/like...and as high as the rabbit hole will take ‘em!


44 posted on 05/31/2016 11:00:17 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why is the justice department reimbursing these crooks for their ethics classes? This should be paid by the offending lawyers, not the taxpayers.

These sanctions were in lieu of jail time, which is what they should have received.


45 posted on 05/31/2016 11:08:46 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

Disbar yes
Jail yes

But more important to deter would be losing pensions and any/all financial security.


46 posted on 05/31/2016 11:10:57 AM PDT by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

ethics is being POLITE

its called obstruction and its criminal....

with this administration there are no rules or law or JUSTICE

it is a dictated mockery of JUSTICE
an attempt to shred the law and the CONSTITUTION
by third rate political hacks
they hate America and all it stands for


47 posted on 05/31/2016 11:13:17 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
BINGO!

I think it is actually far more simple: the DOJ and Homeland have approved more applications, and in making the response to the judge’s order, they would actually have to admit that once again they lied to the court.

So now they squabble over the judge’s order, in hopes that this instead becomes the focus.

And if they can get this judge to overstep his bounds in the enforcement, then they can get a different judge to dismiss the order which might otherwise result in a contempt finding.

48 posted on 05/31/2016 11:26:07 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The judge tried to let them off easy.

What he should have done, and should now do: File a complaint with their respective bars.

It’s a permanent black mark on their records, and they can kiss that cushy partnership goodbye. If it is one of multiple complaints, it may initiate disbarment proceedings.


49 posted on 05/31/2016 11:43:15 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

I agree. If it truly was a conspiracy of a group in the DOJ it should involve disbarment in my view.


50 posted on 05/31/2016 11:49:08 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Send in the fainting couches: http://image0-rubylane.s3.amazonaws.com/shops/buyandbyeantiquesandcollectibles/sp532.1L.jpg?12


51 posted on 05/31/2016 11:55:22 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The judge was an idiot. ‘Misleading’ the court is another way of saying perjury and the US Attorneys should have been prosecuted accordingly.
Of course, the law doesn’t apply to the servants of the Lords of the Beltway.


52 posted on 05/31/2016 12:24:30 PM PDT by Little Ray (NOTHING THAT SOMEONE ELSE HAS TO PAY FOR IS A RIGHT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Good idea !


53 posted on 05/31/2016 1:31:53 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson