Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Email Update: Judicial Watch Releases Former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills Dep...
Judicial Watch ^ | May 31, 2016

Posted on 05/31/2016 1:45:47 PM PDT by jazusamo

Full title: Clinton Email Update: Judicial Watch Releases Former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills Deposition Testimony

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released the deposition transcript of Cheryl D. Mills, Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff throughout her four years as secretary of state. Though instructed by her attorney not to answer several questions, the transcript is available here. Mills was deposed last week as part of the discovery granted to Judicial Watch by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in response to its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured, non-government email system ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). Last week, Judge Sullivan ordered that all deposition transcripts be made publicly available.

Mills testimony covered Clinton’s use of emails; whether FOIA searches were done of Clinton emails, information about the set-up of the Clinton email server; Mills’ communication with Clinton email witness Bryan Pagliano; Mills’ involvement in prior Clinton email controversies; and the handling of politically sensitive FOIA responses. Mills’ attorneys directed her not to answer many questions.

Mills is among seven depositions of former Clinton top aides and State Department officials that Judicial Watch has scheduled over the next four weeks. The next witness is Stephen Mull, the former executive secretary under Clinton. Mull is scheduled to be deposed this Friday, June 3. Former State IT employee Bryan Pagliano is scheduled to testify on Monday, June 6. A State Department official designated by the agency (30(b)(6)) will testify on June 9. Huma Abedin is scheduled to testify on June 28 and top State Department official Patrick Kennedy on June 29.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bethwilkinson; bryanpagliano; cherylmills; cherylmillsdepo; clinton; deposition; discovery; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; judicialwatch; jw; jwdepositions; mills; privateserver; repositoryclinton; soshillary; statedepartment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Ann Archy

“Cheryl Mills needs to have that ugly SMIRK wiped of her face! She needs to be in PRISON!”

Exactly!


21 posted on 05/31/2016 2:50:56 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

That’s not endearing, it’s self centered. The woman is under oath responding to questions of ethnicity and she’s worried about her age...give me a break. Can you imagine if a man said those things? “ Oh dear me, Im soo old..how embarrassing”..unprofessional and childish.


22 posted on 05/31/2016 2:54:49 PM PDT by coloradomomba (Lord God...please use me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Some people just need to be swinging from the end of a rope.


23 posted on 05/31/2016 3:18:22 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Before it’s done you can pick them all


24 posted on 05/31/2016 3:20:46 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

Mills has worked for hildabeast for so long she’s now feeling guilty about having a bad case of white privelege.


25 posted on 05/31/2016 3:36:06 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thank you. I tried to read same. Just pi$$ed me off. CluterF@#K of Lawyers. Does anyone see anything of substance here? Not much accomplished and all these people have the same lawyer paid by her Royal Highness HRC. Sounds like major conflict of interest to me


26 posted on 05/31/2016 4:55:54 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

Yep, the dep is nothing to write home about and Mills comes across as an idiot. We’ll see when all are deposed but this just adds up to show Hillary is a lying conniver in my view.


27 posted on 05/31/2016 5:25:16 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I haven’t read the entire thing as yet

Don't bother. A complete waste of time. Worst transcription ever. Almost no punctuation, words missing, unclear who said what, just a word salad fustercluck.

28 posted on 05/31/2016 5:26:43 PM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

I have a hunch this transcript may have been rushed, it was done over the Memorial Day Weekend, hopefully another will be released that takes care of that.

The first dep of Lukens wasn’t released by JW for eight days and it didn’t read like Mills’ does.


29 posted on 05/31/2016 5:40:50 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
The same inner circle will give you the same answer as in the ‘90s

Most have the same lawyers.

30 posted on 05/31/2016 6:49:28 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Friday, June 3. Former State IT employee Bryan Pagliano is scheduled to testify

That one will be interesting. First question should be did you receive any type of immunity deal from the FBI. What was your conversation with the FBI.

I see what the plaintiff lawyer is doing.

31 posted on 05/31/2016 7:15:22 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson